Intellectual property rights in the era of AI-generated works

Intellectual Property By 0

AI can now make things that look like they were made by humans like art, music, stories, code, designs, and even new inventions. This raises a big question: who should own these creations, and why?

Courts and governments are trying to decide rules about authorship, originality, ownership, and copying. The challenge is to support human creators while also allowing AI to grow responsibly.

To make this work, we need clear rules about how AI uses training data, what counts as fair use and how licensing works.

These rules should be supported worldwide to protect creativity, attract investment, stop misuse, and let AI help humans instead of replacing them.

Collegium System For Appointment Of Judges Is Against Equality

Constitutional law By 0

The collegium system allows judges to appoint judges, making it a closed process.
It lacks transparency and accountability, creating chances of favoritism.
This goes against Articles 14 and 16, which ensure equality and equal opportunity.
Judges hold public office, so appointments should be fair and open to all.
Reforms like a Judicial Appointments Commission are needed to balance independence with equality