- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Consent Managers under India’s DPDP Regime: Gatekeepers of Data Autonomy or Instruments of Big-Fiduciary Control?
- In the Line of Uncertainty: Living and Working Under Fire in LWE-Affected Areas
- Night LRP in LWE-Affected Areas: Strategy, Sacrifice, and Silent Vigil
- A Case Study of Teitiota v. New Zealand (UN Human Rights Committee, 2020)
- Procedural Purity and the End of the Going Concern Safety Net
- Understanding Expenditure Sensitive Constituencies in Indian Elections
- Term Sheets in Investment Transactions: Legal Effect, Key Clauses, and Court Interpretation
- The 3-Hour Takedown: How India’s New IT Rules Are Reshaping the Digital Battlefield
Introduction – Why Re-Examining AHO Matters Traffic regulations impose continuous obligations on citizens and therefore must satisfy proportionality, reasonableness, and…
Introduction The case of Sunflame Enterprises Private Limited v. Kitchenopedia Appliances Private Limited & Anr. exemplifies a classic trademark battle…
Delhi High Court granted injunction against Dabur’s Cool King Thanda Tael for passing off through deceptively similar red trade dress, bottle design, and marks imitating Emami’s Navratna Oil. The judgment underscores trade dress protection based on acquired distinctiveness in the therapeutic cooling oil market.
Delhi High Court allows appeal against trial court’s interim injunction in trademark suit over “ATHERMAL,” holding appellant’s prima facie prior use since 1990 through predecessor superior to respondents’ 2017 registration and 2003 claim, distinguishes approbate and reprobate as inapplicable to primary mark, sets aside order.
In this consolidated judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus and certiorari against trademark acceptance orders, holding that Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, grants the Registrar discretionary suo moto power to withdraw erroneous acceptances without provision for third-party applications, directing aggrieved parties to opposition under Section 21; allowed appeal against refusal order due to Registry inconsistencies, mandating unified adjudication of related proceedings.
Domain Names as Corporate Identity: Overview In the contemporary digital economy, domain names have evolved beyond mere web addresses to…
Digital India Journey: A Decade of Transformation Last year, on 1st July 2025, India celebrated a decade of the Digital…
India is one of the few countries in the world with the capability to design and build helicopters entirely within…
What Is Gem Portal Registration? Gem portal registration is a crucial step for businesses that want to supply goods and…
Introduction – The Digital Transformation of Right to Education Right to education is a one of the fundamental rights to…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

