Sports and entertainment law occupies a dynamic and high-stakes intersection of commerce, culture, and celebrity, governing two of the world’s…

Witnesses continue to occupy the centre-stage of criminal justice. Even in an age dominated by DNA, CCTV and digital forensics,…

There are careers that make noise, and then there are careers that quietly remake the institutions we take for granted.…

In One of the Most Consequential Legal Rulings in Modern American History In one of the most consequential legal rulings…

A Geographical Indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities, reputation,…

Brief Introduction This case arises out of an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, challenging the refusal…

Saudi Arabia’s system of governance, a monarchy deeply rooted in its history and Islamic tradition, operates on a unique principle…

The 2025 amendments to Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules mark a subtle but significant shift in India’s takedown architecture: a single “authorised intimation” can now determine the fate of online speech. By replacing the ambiguous “actual knowledge” standard with a system of senior-level authorisation and reasoned notices, the government aims to curb arbitrary removals while equipping intermediaries with clearer legal cues. Yet the reforms also consolidate state discretion, introduce new bureaucratic layers, and leave users without meaningful avenues to contest takedowns. Positioned against global trends favouring transparency and user rights, India’s model remains executive-centric, raising pressing questions about proportionality, operational capacity, and the future of safe-harbour. This piece critically evaluates whether the new regime strengthens procedural accountability or merely streamlines state control over digital expression.

Brief Introductory Head Note Summary: This case involves a legal battle over a patent application for a special kind of medicine…

Analysing the BNSS Framework, Constitutional Safeguards, and Supreme Court Jurisprudence on Mandatory FIR Registration Introduction Recent media reports indicate that…