- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Supreme Court to Examine Mandatory NAT Testing in Blood Banks Across India
- CJI Surya Kant Objects to NCERT Class 8 Book Mentioning Corruption in Judiciary
- New MCA Compliance Penalties You Must Know in 2025
- Financial Creditors and Operational Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
- Women and Environmental Justice in India: Climate Change, Resource Access, and Gendered Sustainability
- Legal Avenues Available for Combating IED Attacks in India
- The Impact on Mental Health of Police Personnel Working in LWE-Affected Areas
- Police Casualties from IED Mishandling and Defusal
Saudi Arabia’s system of governance, a monarchy deeply rooted in its history and Islamic tradition, operates on a unique principle…
The 2025 amendments to Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules mark a subtle but significant shift in India’s takedown architecture: a single “authorised intimation” can now determine the fate of online speech. By replacing the ambiguous “actual knowledge” standard with a system of senior-level authorisation and reasoned notices, the government aims to curb arbitrary removals while equipping intermediaries with clearer legal cues. Yet the reforms also consolidate state discretion, introduce new bureaucratic layers, and leave users without meaningful avenues to contest takedowns. Positioned against global trends favouring transparency and user rights, India’s model remains executive-centric, raising pressing questions about proportionality, operational capacity, and the future of safe-harbour. This piece critically evaluates whether the new regime strengthens procedural accountability or merely streamlines state control over digital expression.
Brief Introductory Head Note Summary: This case involves a legal battle over a patent application for a special kind of medicine…
Analysing the BNSS Framework, Constitutional Safeguards, and Supreme Court Jurisprudence on Mandatory FIR Registration Introduction Recent media reports indicate that…
Witnesses are the backbone of criminal justice, converting facts into proof. From experts to child victims, hostile approvers to digital…
Introduction: In a landmark pronouncement dated November 28, 2025, the Supreme Court of India, in L.K. Prabhu @ L. Krishna…
Adjournment culture in Indian courts has become a serious structural threat to the right to speedy justice. That unforgettable Sunny…
When India’s National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) tells a company to organize meetings for its shareholders or creditors (as part…
Abstract Criminal Justice Reform in India is at a critical crossroads, with rising case backlogs, overcrowded prisons, and delays that…
Introduction In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian jurisprudence, the Supreme Court stands as the sentinel of constitutional values, ensuring uniformity,…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

