Introduction
The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 is one of the most progressive and transformative reforms in the history of Hindu personal law. Before this amendment, daughters were treated unequally in matters of ancestral property. Sons were recognised as coparceners (joint owners by birth), while daughters were not — which meant they had no equal right in the family property.
The 2005 amendment changed this injustice by granting daughters the same coparcenary rights as sons, by birth, in ancestral property.
What Changed in 2005?
Before 2005
- Only sons were coparceners in a Hindu joint family.
- Daughters had only a limited right to maintenance or marriage expenses, not ownership.
After 2005
- Daughters are coparceners by birth, just like sons.
- They have the same rights and liabilities in ancestral property.
- They can demand partition, manage property, and dispose of their share.
| Aspect | Before 2005 | After 2005 |
|---|---|---|
| Status in Coparcenary | Only sons | Both sons and daughters |
| Right by Birth | No for daughters | Yes for daughters |
| Right to Partition | No for daughters | Yes for daughters |
This amendment applies to daughters born before or after 2005, as clarified by the Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020).
Why Is This Amendment So Important?
- It ensures gender equality in property rights.
- It empowers women economically, giving them security and independence.
- It strengthens the constitutional values of equality and dignity.
- It challenges deep-rooted patriarchal norms in Indian society.
Property ownership is not just about wealth — it is about power, voice, and security. When daughters get equal rights, they are no longer dependent on male relatives for their financial future.
How Has It Impacted Society?
- Women now legally own and control property.
- It has reduced arbitrary disinheritance of daughters.
- It has increased awareness about women’s legal rights.
- It has contributed to changing mindsets within families.
However, many families still deny daughters their rightful share due to lack of awareness or social pressure.
Why People Must Know About This Law
Awareness is the key to justice. If daughters and families do not know about this right, the law remains only on paper.
- Daughters should know they can legally claim their share.
- Families should know that denying a daughter her share is illegal and unjust.
- Society must move beyond treating daughters as temporary members of the family.
Conclusion
The 2005 amendment is not just a legal reform — it is a social revolution. It recognises daughters as equal members of the family, not as outsiders who leave after marriage. True equality will be achieved only when this law is not just enforced in courts but respected in homes.
Giving daughters equal rights in property is not charity — it is justice.
see
