- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- Woman Law
- Panchayati Raj System in India: Constitutional Framework, Structure, and Significance
- Mandatory Timelines in Trademark Opposition
- Manual Scavenging: A Challenge to India
- Misuse Of Ai And Deepfake Technology: A Challenge To Privacy And Criminal Law In India
- Uniform Civil Code in India: Constitutional Perspectives and an Empirical Study
- Role of Jammers and Bulletproof Vehicles in VVIP Security
- Supreme Court Reaffirms Constitutional Discipline in DGP Appointments
- An in-depth legal analysis of the SIR case, examining Article 324, due process, voter rights, and limits on Election Commission powers
Intellectual Property
Introduction The case of Yokogawa Electric Corporation v. Union of India represents a significant judicial pronouncement on the procedural rigours governing trademark opposition proceedings…
Patents Act, 1970 — Sections 14, 15, 25(1) and Rule 55(5) — Examination and pre-grant opposition — Distinct and independent proceedings — Requirement of separate hearings where objections or prior art differ — Composite order must demarcate examination and opposition findings — Mechanical adoption of opponent’s submissions vitiates order — Violation of natural justice warrants remand to different Controller for fresh consideration — Appeal allowed.
Held: Where FER objections and opposition grounds are not identical and new prior art is introduced in opposition, separate hearings under Sections 14 and 25(1) are mandatory. Controller must independently apply mind and provide reasons. Pre-grant opponent has no locus in examination proceedings. Matter remanded for de novo consideration with liberty to all parties on merits
Introduction The batch of appeals decided by the Division Bench…
Innovation and Patent Landscape Analysis Innovation is the competitive essence today, which means that companies…
Trademark Dispute in the Plywood Industry This case pertains to a dispute over trademark rights…
Copyright Infringement in Medical Publications The present case revolves around allegations of copyright infringement in…
Lake Mount Educational Society & Anr. Vs. Global Educational Trust Introduction The dispute in Lake…
Kamdhenu Limited Vs. Union of India – High Court of Delhi Case Overview This case…
ITC Limited v. Pravin Kumar & Ors. Case Number: IP-COM/12/2025 | Date of Order: 20…
Case Summary This case involves a significant dispute in the field of intellectual property law,…
Overview This case explores the critical intersection of trademark law, procedural fairness, and corporate liquidation…
Newgen IT Technologies Ltd. v. Newgen Software Technologies Ltd. Court: High Court of Delhi at…
Understanding Trademarks In today’s world of business, every company wants to stand out from the…
Penguin Books Ltd. Vs India Book Distributors & Ors. Date of Order: 1 August 1984…
Sita Ram Iron Foundry and Engineering Works v. Hindustan Technocast (P) Ltd. & Anr. Date…
Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. V-Guard Industries Ltd. In the case of…
Case Summary: Global IEEE Institute for Engineers v. IEEE Mumbai Section Welfare Association This case…
Rajasthan Aushdhalaya Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Himalaya Global Holdings Ltd. & Anr. Date of Order: 04…
Case Summary This case revolves around the conflict between Chile and Peru over the exclusive…
Introduction / Overview On April 15, 2025, the Supreme Court has given the order to…
Case Summary This case revolves around the interpretation of the proviso to Order XXV Rule…
Introduction In the dynamic realm of pharmaceutical innovation, the conflict between patent protection and public…
Case Overview This case concerns a patent infringement dispute involving a technological startup and a…
Editors Picks
How To Submit Your Article
- Click here to Register if you're a new user.
- Login if you've already registered.
- Once you're logged in, go to the dashboard and
Submit Your Article! ✍
Lawyers in India
Click on the link to search for lawyers in IndiaFile Copyright Registration
Protect Your Work Instantly – File Copyright Registration Now!File Caveat in Supreme Court
Instant Caveat Filing Done my Expert Lawyers from Supreme court, Quick and Cost effectiveFile Mutual Divorce In Delhi/NCR
Experience lawyers from Over 25 years find you the best Divorce Solution here.Recent Topics
Latest Posts
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

