- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- International Reputation Insufficient Without Indian Goodwill
- Challenges of enforcement of an Arbitral Award
- Substantive Law vs. Procedural Law: Key Differences
- Road Opening Party (ROP): A Critical Security Framework for Safe Mobility
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett and the Meaning of Judicial Independence in the U.S. Supreme Court
- Don’t Be a Dead Hero While Handling IEDs
- Underdevelopment as a Driver of Left-Wing Extremism in India
- John Doe Defendants and the Merger Rule
Intellectual Property
Madras High Court dismisses appeals by 7-Eleven International LLC, upholds Deputy Registrar’s 2014 order granting “Big Bite” trademark registration in Class 30 to Ravi Foods Private Limited as prior user in India; holds that international reputation and prior foreign adoption/early filing date cannot override local prior use absent proof of goodwill or spillover reputation in India, reinforcing strict application of territoriality under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Delhi High Court holds that in defamation suits filed against anonymous “John Doe” defendants under Section 19 CPC, territorial jurisdiction is determined based on circumstances at the time of institution, and subsequent revelation of defendants’ identities does not warrant return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10, even if it reveals a merger of wrong and residence; demurrer principle applies, barring evidentiary inquiries into plaint documents at threshold stage.
Introduction The Delhi High Court in a significant trademark rectification…
Editors Picks
How To Submit Your Article
- Click here to Register if you're a new user.
- Login if you've already registered.
- Once you're logged in, go to the dashboard and
Submit Your Article! ✍
Lawyers in India
Click on the link to search for lawyers in IndiaFile Copyright Registration
Protect Your Work Instantly – File Copyright Registration Now!File Caveat in Supreme Court
Instant Caveat Filing Done my Expert Lawyers from Supreme court, Quick and Cost effectiveFile Mutual Divorce In Delhi/NCR
Experience lawyers from Over 25 years find you the best Divorce Solution here.Recent Topics
Latest Posts
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

