Trending
- Logical Discrepancy as a Ground for Voter Deletion during SIR in West Bengal: A Legal Analysis
- Analyzing the Landmark Judgment: Budhadev Karmakar v. State of West Bengal (2022) – A Step Towards Dignity for Sex Workers in India
- NVRA-Style Protections: State Bears a Heavy Burden Before Removing a Voter from the Rolls
- Procedural Separation in Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition
- Balancing Registration Rights and Prior User Goodwill
- Category I, II And III AIFS: Legal Distinctions
- Impact Of Article 13 On Pre-Constitutional Laws In The Context Of Recent Supreme Court Judgments
- The Shield Against Arbitrary Disenfranchisement: An Analysis of Lal Babu Hussein v. Electoral Registration Officer (1995)
Politics
Patents Act, 1970 — Sections 14, 15, 25(1) and Rule 55(5) — Examination and pre-grant opposition — Distinct and independent proceedings — Requirement of separate hearings where objections or prior art differ — Composite order must demarcate examination and opposition findings — Mechanical adoption of opponent’s submissions vitiates order — Violation of natural justice warrants remand to different Controller for fresh consideration — Appeal allowed.
Held: Where FER objections and opposition grounds are not identical and new prior art is introduced in opposition, separate hearings under Sections 14 and 25(1) are mandatory. Controller must independently apply mind and provide reasons. Pre-grant opponent has no locus in examination proceedings. Matter remanded for de novo consideration with liberty to all parties on merits
Trodat GMBH Vs Addprint India Enterprises Introduction This case presents a significant examination of the…
Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd. v. Kamdhenu Industries Ltd Overview The case of Kamdhenu Ispat Ltd. v.…
Lummus Novolen Technology GmbH v/s Assistant Controller of Patents Case Summary This case revolves around…
The current paper critically reviews the judicial tendencies in the context of visual and phonetic…
On a Quiet Morning in Ahmedabad On a quiet morning in Ahmedabad, the usual day…
This case pertains to the registrability of the phrase “ONE FOR ALL” as a trademark…
Landmark Case Analysis: Prina Chemical Works & Others v. Sukhdayal & Others Introduction The case…
Ivy Entertainment Private Limited Vs. HR Pictures Date: March 27, 2025 Case No: (COMM) 264/2025…
Khoday Distilleries Limited vs. The Scotch Whisky Association Date of Judgment: May 27, 2008 Appeal:…
Balar Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Lakha Ram Sharma CM(M)-IPD 5/2025, decided on March 27, 2025…
Trademark Dispute: Steelcase Inc. vs. Steel Case India Pvt. Ltd. This case revolves around a…
Introduction The rapid generation of AI-based works on a broad scale has challenged the fundamentals…
President Droupadi Murmu has asked the Supreme Court of India to rule on a set…
Caste Census: Casting Light Where History Hid the Truth India’s first caste census after independence…
Learn about the patent process in India, including steps, costs, online filing, and common patent drafting mistakes to avoid.
Protect your brand identity with hassle-free online trademark registration Get Expert Help Now – Ph…
Introduction In the modern competitive market, the visual appeal of a product often plays a…
© 2026 Legal Service India – Law, lawyers & legal Resources.
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6