In this consolidated judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus and certiorari against trademark acceptance orders, holding that Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, grants the Registrar discretionary suo moto power to withdraw erroneous acceptances without provision for third-party applications, directing aggrieved parties to opposition under Section 21; allowed appeal against refusal order due to Registry inconsistencies, mandating unified adjudication of related proceedings.

Domain Names as Corporate Identity: Overview In the contemporary digital economy, domain names have evolved beyond mere web addresses to…

Digital India Journey: A Decade of Transformation Last year, on 1st July 2025, India celebrated a decade of the Digital…

India is one of the few countries in the world with the capability to design and build helicopters entirely within…

What Is Gem Portal Registration? Gem portal registration is a crucial step for businesses that want to supply goods and…

Introduction – The Digital Transformation of Right to Education Right to education is a one of the fundamental rights to…

Abstract In this fast-paced and competitive business environment, companies always aim to increase strategic flexibility, enhance shareholder value, and improve…

Introduction: A New Institutional Phase The landscape of Indian labour law, prior to 2019, was a complex and fragmented tapestry…

Introduction: The Necessity of a Robust Insolvency Framework Corporate insolvency law, often perceived as the final chapter in a company’s…

Mandatory ITR Filing for Firms and LLPs The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has made it mandatory to file…