3 Years Practice Judgement A Curse For The Aspirants Or A Boon To The Judicial System Of India?

Education Law By 5

On the date of 20th May 2025, the Supreme Court of India under the bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Mr. Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih and Justice Krishnan Vinod Chandran held, that the aspiring students for the examination of civil judge (junior division) must go on a period of 3-years legal practice before appearing in the examinations. This verdict of the Supreme Court was directed to be amended as quickly as possible to all the High Courts of India. After the judgement came, the debate was seen to be divided between the aspirants and the practicing advocates. Both the parties gave their own personal opinion on the hurdles they were facing and others shared their views on the judgement and issues that they might face after the order passed. In this blog, we are going to briefly discuss both the opinions and as well as the problems that might arise for some sections of the group. We will also talk about the necessity of the rule and as well as the issues it might create for the desiring aspirants. At last, this report would sum up with the answer of the question that the title arises.

Making Registered Wills Mandatory in India: A Legal Reform for Enhanced Succession Certainty and Judicial Efficiency

Family Law By 0

In the context of India’s rapidly evolving socio-economic landscape, characterized by shifting family structures and escalating property values, the need for robust mechanisms to facilitate seamless asset succession has become imperative. This article examines the legal merits of mandating the registration of wills under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. Drawing on judicial precedents, empirical data on litigation, and comparative insights, it argues that compulsory registration would bolster the evidentiary value of wills, mitigate family disputes, expedite probate processes, and safeguard against fraud. While acknowledging potential implementation challenges, the article posits that such a reform aligns with principles of legal certainty and public policy, ultimately promoting judicial efficiency and societal harmony along with substantial reduction of judicial pendencies in Court.