Case Overview The Delhi High Court in a significant ruling has set aside the refusal of a patent application involving…

Global Context of Women’s Rights India’s struggle for women’s rights exists not in isolation but within a global context of…

Madras High Court dismisses appeals by 7-Eleven International LLC, upholds Deputy Registrar’s 2014 order granting “Big Bite” trademark registration in Class 30 to Ravi Foods Private Limited as prior user in India; holds that international reputation and prior foreign adoption/early filing date cannot override local prior use absent proof of goodwill or spillover reputation in India, reinforcing strict application of territoriality under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Introduction Most challenging stage of a suit for recovery and/ or an arbitration proceeding is executing a money decree and/…

Law is fundamentally divided into two interconnected parts: substantive law and procedural law (also known as adjective law). Substantive law…

Introduction The Road Opening Party (ROP) is a specialized security formation deployed to sanitize, secure, and dominate a designated stretch…

History Watching the Present There are rooms in public life where history does not merely hang on the walls —…

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) are among the deadliest threats faced by security forces because they are designed to exploit human…

Introduction Left-Wing Extremism (LWE), commonly known as Naxalism or Maoism in India, remains one of the country’s most enduring internal…

Delhi High Court holds that in defamation suits filed against anonymous “John Doe” defendants under Section 19 CPC, territorial jurisdiction is determined based on circumstances at the time of institution, and subsequent revelation of defendants’ identities does not warrant return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10, even if it reveals a merger of wrong and residence; demurrer principle applies, barring evidentiary inquiries into plaint documents at threshold stage.