- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- Woman Law
- Mere Corporate Prefix Insufficient to Avoid Deceptive Similarity
- The Silent Sky: The Evolution and Proliferation of Drone-Borne IEDs (DBIEDs)
- New Vistas in IED Attacks: Emerging Tactics, Technologies, and Threat Horizons
- Copyright Punishment in India: Law, Reality and the Creator’s Struggle
- Medical Examination of Rape Victims: Legal Mandates and Judicial Safeguards
- Panchayati Raj System in India: Constitutional Framework, Structure, and Significance
- Mandatory Timelines in Trademark Opposition
- Manual Scavenging: A Challenge to India
Delhi High Court allows appeal against trial court’s interim injunction in trademark suit over “ATHERMAL,” holding appellant’s prima facie prior use since 1990 through predecessor superior to respondents’ 2017 registration and 2003 claim, distinguishes approbate and reprobate as inapplicable to primary mark, sets aside order.
In this consolidated judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus and certiorari against trademark acceptance orders, holding that Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, grants the Registrar discretionary suo moto power to withdraw erroneous acceptances without provision for third-party applications, directing aggrieved parties to opposition under Section 21; allowed appeal against refusal order due to Registry inconsistencies, mandating unified adjudication of related proceedings.
Domain Names as Corporate Identity: Overview In the contemporary digital economy, domain names have evolved beyond mere web addresses to…
Digital India Journey: A Decade of Transformation Last year, on 1st July 2025, India celebrated a decade of the Digital…
India is one of the few countries in the world with the capability to design and build helicopters entirely within…
What Is Gem Portal Registration? Gem portal registration is a crucial step for businesses that want to supply goods and…
Introduction – The Digital Transformation of Right to Education Right to education is a one of the fundamental rights to…
Abstract In this fast-paced and competitive business environment, companies always aim to increase strategic flexibility, enhance shareholder value, and improve…
Introduction: A New Institutional Phase The landscape of Indian labour law, prior to 2019, was a complex and fragmented tapestry…
Introduction: The Necessity of a Robust Insolvency Framework Corporate insolvency law, often perceived as the final chapter in a company’s…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

