- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Termination of Contractual Faculty and the Applicability of Natural Justice: Netaji Subhash University of Technology v. M. P. Chaudhary (2026)
- Why Export of Gems and Jewellery from India Continues to Shine Worldwide
- Why HHMD and DFMD Are Not Enough to Detect Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)
- The Pitfalls of Eliminating Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) Without Follow-Up Developmental Action
- The Nature of Harm Inflicted by Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)
- Delay Cannot Be the Sole Ground: The Evolving Law on Compassionate Appointments
- Public Livelihood Protection And AI Transparency Act
- Appeal Process for Company Matters from NCLAT and Other Tribunals to the Supreme Court of India
Browsing: Just In
POCSO Act – Abstract & Analysis Abstract Child sexual abuse has emerged as a pressing concern in India, demanding a…
Facts and Timeline of Proceedings Facts and Timeline of Proceedings The case is that of corruption, where one Sita Soren,…
Article on “Regulation of viral content in social networking sites”
Case Summary — Velji Karamshi Vaid & Anr. Vs V3 Fashion & Ors. Commercial IP Suit No. 348 of 2025…
Deepfakes and Indian Law — Readability Improved Introduction Technology today allows us to create almost anything on a screen. With…
Working in law enforcement is tough Police officers are responsible for public safety, but this job also exposes them to…
On the date of 20th May 2025, the Supreme Court of India under the bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Mr. Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih and Justice Krishnan Vinod Chandran held, that the aspiring students for the examination of civil judge (junior division) must go on a period of 3-years legal practice before appearing in the examinations. This verdict of the Supreme Court was directed to be amended as quickly as possible to all the High Courts of India. After the judgement came, the debate was seen to be divided between the aspirants and the practicing advocates. Both the parties gave their own personal opinion on the hurdles they were facing and others shared their views on the judgement and issues that they might face after the order passed. In this blog, we are going to briefly discuss both the opinions and as well as the problems that might arise for some sections of the group. We will also talk about the necessity of the rule and as well as the issues it might create for the desiring aspirants. At last, this report would sum up with the answer of the question that the title arises.
DNA from Human Remains — Causes of Damage and Practical Responses Getting DNA from human bones or bodies is very…
Abstract The Indian judiciary continues to face a persistent crisis of pendency, where millions of cases remain unresolved for years.…
Abstract – History of Indian Law Law as a matter of religious perception develops in the history of India. Different…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

