- Home
- Law Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
- Delhi High Court in Shiksha Kumari v. Santosh Kumar: One-Year Separation Not Mandatory for Mutual Consent Divorce
- Dowry Death and Dilution of Mehr: Supreme Court Landmark in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ajmal Beg & Jamila Beg (Dec 2025)
- The National Herald Case: A Complete Story of Allegations, Law, Politics, and the Latest Court Verdict
- The New York Convention and the Global Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
- The Penal Code, 1860: A Historical and Jurisprudential Analysis in the Context of Bangladesh
- The Shield of Necessity: An Analysis of the Right to Private Defence under the Penal Code, 1860
- AI-Driven Cyber Crimes
- Mechanisms and Principles of Enforcing European Union Law
Browsing: Picks
Specialized UN Agencies: ILO, FAO, UNESCO (Improved Readability) Introduction Globalization has created a world where labour rights, agricultural productivity, and…
Essel Sports Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India — Case Summary Factual Background Essel Sports Pvt. Ltd., the plaintiff, is…
Copyright — Artistic Works (India) Introduction Artistic expression—whether via drawings, photographs, memes, or AI-generated images—is central to online creativity. However,…
The Tiny Genital Tubercle of Sonography and the Mighty PCPNDT Act: Sonologist vs Criminologist Abstract The intersection of prenatal sonography…
Working in law enforcement is tough Police officers are responsible for public safety, but this job also exposes them to…
Understanding Separation of power and its implication in Indian Legal System with the landmark caselaw of Indra Gandhi V Raj Narain, challenging the election of Gandhi in House of People.
This article critically examines the SC’s intervention in the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar’s voter list and its implications for Indian democracy. It highlights how the EC’s new requirements demand extensive documentation to reapply, even for long registered voters, shift the burden of proof of citizenship onto individuals, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups such as rural women and migrant workers. The piece argues that such measures risk undermining universal suffrage, constitutional guarantees, and the inclusiveness of India’s democratic process.
SEBI the security and exchange board of india is the statutory regulatory body for Indian security market established to protect invested promoter to developer of fair trading practice and regulate entity like stock exchange broker and mutual funds
John Doe Orders (Ashok Kumar Orders) Imagine you own a creative work — a film, a song, or a new…
On the date of 20th May 2025, the Supreme Court of India under the bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Mr. Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Justice Augustine George Masih and Justice Krishnan Vinod Chandran held, that the aspiring students for the examination of civil judge (junior division) must go on a period of 3-years legal practice before appearing in the examinations. This verdict of the Supreme Court was directed to be amended as quickly as possible to all the High Courts of India. After the judgement came, the debate was seen to be divided between the aspirants and the practicing advocates. Both the parties gave their own personal opinion on the hurdles they were facing and others shared their views on the judgement and issues that they might face after the order passed. In this blog, we are going to briefly discuss both the opinions and as well as the problems that might arise for some sections of the group. We will also talk about the necessity of the rule and as well as the issues it might create for the desiring aspirants. At last, this report would sum up with the answer of the question that the title arises.
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

