Online Copyright Registration in India

Protect your creative work
Books, Songs, film, websites, Software, painting, fashion Design etc
Call now: 09891244487

Ask Our legal Experts, on issues related to Divorce

File Mutual Consent divorce right away

Call at ph no: 9650499965
Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

To Appeal before CIC - Central Information Commission
For Filing and Hearing contact: Choudhury's law Office
Ph no: 9873628941

Author Topic: FIR UNDER 420,467,468 AND 471  (Read 777 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sandesh02

  • Newlaw
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Welcome to legal Service India - law forum for free legal Information
    • View Profile
FIR UNDER 420,467,468 AND 471
« on: October 24, 2014, 01:33:00 AM »
        CASE
1.   In 1992, total of 13 beegha agriculture land was purchased by 30 people. The division of land was done in registry without  enmarking specific place, but it was written that all purchasers will give way for commutation to each other.In my possession 1328 square yard of land came.This land was duly transferrred to my name by way of mutation.
2.   In 1995,I sold three plots measuring 200 square yard each and gave possession of the same to each of the buyers.
3.   In the year 2008, I applied for conversion of  my remaining 728 square yard land from erstwhile UIT(Urban Improvement trust),the 90B of the said land was done but patta was not granted.
4.   Thus , leaving apart 600 square yard sold by me, I got 90B done.
5.   The buyer was required to obtain mutation from concerned authority.It was his responsibility as per documents to get mutation done for his purchased land.
6.   In the FIR,the complainant has said that he has  purchased a plot numbered 8(EIGHT) of 200 square yard in the year 1995. To his misconception , the same plot has been resold by me to someone else(AND THIS IS NOT THE TRUTH , NOT SO).
7.   The complainant has lodged an FIR under SECTION 420,467,468 and 471in the above case. No documentary proof of the resale as mentioned in point 6 above has been submitted by the complainant.
8.   The complainant has lodged the FIR only on the basis of a vigyapti read by him in the newspaper published by someone claiming to be the owner of 8 number plot.

QUESTION
1.Can this FIR be quashed in this case? (LOOKING INTO THE FACT THAT IT IS A NINETEEN YEAR OLD DEAL)
2.What other preventive measures we should take?
3.Should we apply for anticipatory bail?
4.PLEASE HELP AND ADVICE

 

File a Consumer Complaint
Property verification
Call: 9873628941
 

Lawyers in India - Listed city wise Mumbai
Bangalore
Pune
Pondicherry
Jaipur
lawyers in London
lawyers in Birmingham
Chennai
Allahabad
Ahmedabad
Jodhpur
Indore
lawyers in Toronto
lawyers in Sydney

Cochin
Lucknow
Ranchi
Thane
Janjgir
lawyers in Milan
Johannesburg

Delhi - New Delhi
Chandigarh
Surat
Nashik
lawyers in New York
los Angeles
Kolkata
Hyderabad
Rajkot
Nagpur
lawyers in Dhaka
lawyers in Dubai

Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi - Ph no: 9650499965

Home | Bare Acts | Law Forms | Supreme Court Judgments | Legal Advice | Lawyers | Submit article | Sitemap | Contact Us

legal Service India.com is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2016
Get Free legal Advice here from top notch lawyers in India