Am the first barrister ever to sue a (London) Chambers (4 New Square (“R”) in 2008) for race discrimination, and since 2013, am the first person ever to sue sitting High Court judges, for racism, perjury and Contempt of Court!
A key issue concerns R and Mr Justice Stuart-Smith’s (“JSS”) 2009 evidence that he was “certainly” appointed Race / Equal Opportunities Officer (“EOO”) at my Chambers for many years before the 2008 claim, and in 2009 “formally” handed over this EOO role to Nick Davidson QC and Clare Dixon.
But he, Carr J, and each R lied - in fact he was never appointed EOO by any Member (nor known as EOO), and in 2011:
(a) Nick Davidson QC and Clare Dixon at my Chambers emailed me there was “no handover” to them, and they have “no recollection” Stuart-Smith was their predecessor as EOO, proving the perjury
(b) documents were disclosed that R had concealed key correspondence with the Bar Council in 2005 and 2006 reminding them it was a mandatory requirement to appoint a Member as “high priority”, and to inform them each year who it was.
Instead of ousting the racist clerks, R, Carr J and Stuart-Smith J, my Chambers unlawfully ousted me in 2013, and the Bar Council / white judges have taken no action against them or protected me, despite the 2008 ET finding:
(i) I had proved a prima facie case of race discrimination - my clerks (Dennis Peck (promoted), Dominic Sabini (invited to resign), Steve Purse (promoted at Crown Office Chambers) had "very troubling" and "abiding" racist attitudes, and there was a £multi-million disparity in earnings between my white male comparators and I
(ii) my Chambers breached the Bar Council's Equality Code for fair allocation of work
and the EAT President, Langstaff J giving me permission to appeal:
(iii) “The context was one in which the issue was one of harassment / detriment being caused to the Appellant by the continued presence in the clerks’ room of those whom she regarded as ill-disposed toward her on racial grounds. The argument (put briefly) was that the “guilty” clerks had to be removed or sufficiently disciplined by the Respondents to prevent that effect”.
(iv) See the audacity of dishonest JSS https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/sentencing-remarks-of-mr-justice-stuart-smith-r-v-ashley-mote/
"Your greed and dishonesty were matched only by your hypocrisy, your culpability is very high. You abused your position of power, trust and responsibility; you continued your fraudulent activity over a sustained period of time Your offences had a considerable impact on the victim"
But no judge (Slade J and Elias LJ) has addressed this issue of Langstaff J, or the ongoing fraud – they have since been forced to reveal relevant relationships with my Chambers and rogue Counsel, Richard Leiper (similar to Dame Butler-Sloss and Fiona Woolf humiliated into resigning from the child abuse inquiry last year (once their relevant relationships were exposed)).
Instead of abiding by their overriding duty to the administration of justice, R’s lawyers and white judges have abetted the unlawful conduct against me, and each of the judges who have found against me and ignored the fraud of R and their lawyers, since 2009, are at risk of serving very lengthy custodial sentences themselves.
In August 2015, the Court of Appeal has finally issued my application to re-open the 2008 ET claim!
I have formally applied to the QBD, for R, their rogue lawyers, and the unlawful judges who have found against me, to be committed to prison. I have been trying to privately prosecute them since March 2015, but the courts have neither issued nor responded, despite chase-ups.
Pls assist or advise. Will a specialist advise or represent me to a win please? Ground-breaking case, and huge profile. Biggest crisis and cover-up since the Jimmy Savile abuse scandal