Online Copyright Registration in India

Protect your creative work
Books, Songs, film, websites, Software, painting, fashion Design etc
Call now: 09891244487

Ask Our legal Experts, on issues related to Divorce

File Mutual Consent divorce right away

Call at ph no: 9650499965
Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

To Appeal before CIC - Central Information Commission
For Filing and Hearing contact: Choudhury's law Office
Ph no: 8851046564

Author Topic: How to stop Advocate's Contradiction (Serious matter)  (Read 513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tarachand

  • Newlaw
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Welcome to legal Service India - law forum for free legal Information
    • View Profile
How to stop Advocate's Contradiction (Serious matter)
« on: February 12, 2017, 11:33:50 AM »
Sir/Madam

   The Ex-mayor of my area previously admitted in 2006 that he is the Owner of the suit Flat

   On the basis of his statement the order of status quo was granted to me till next date

   The said status quo Order was extended 30 times and ultimately in 2012 Exh-5 was allowed in my favour

   But in 2012 I came to know that the said Ex_Mayor had already sole the suit Flat by putting name of his wife in front and transferred the possession of the said Flat to third person in 2007

   But in the Court during the time of 30 times extension of status Quo Order the Ex-Mayor did not informed anything and continued with the statement that he is the owner of the suit FLAT and he has possession of the suit Flat

   But when I came to know the breach of the Status Quo Order then I filed M.A U/O.39 R2A and in that MA the Ex-Mayor gave contradictory statement that he is not the owner but his wife is the Owner and she sold the suit Flat

   For such contrary statement the Ex-Mayor was prosecuted for alternate perjury by the Civil Judge and he is facing trial before the CJM

   BUT the matter is that the Ex-Mayor has given first statement and thereafter for all 30 times when the Order of Status Quo was extended and thereafter one he gave contradictory statement he has been having only one Advocate and under his legal guidance only he ahs done all these things


   PRESENT SITUATION :-



   And Now dates of both RCS and the said MA are on same day and his Advocate is representing such contradictory statements (first) he says that he is the owner in RCS and then (after five minutes) he says that he is not the owner

   Does the Advocate is allowed to do so :-

How to stop this non sense ?

Guide
HARIOM

 

File a Consumer Complaint
Property verification
Call: 9873628941
 

Lawyers in India - Listed city wise Mumbai
Bangalore
Pune
Pondicherry
Jaipur
lawyers in London
lawyers in Birmingham
Chennai
Allahabad
Ahmedabad
Jodhpur
Indore
lawyers in Toronto
lawyers in Sydney

Cochin
Lucknow
Ranchi
Thane
Janjgir
lawyers in Milan
Johannesburg

Delhi - New Delhi
Chandigarh
Surat
Nashik
lawyers in New York
los Angeles
Kolkata
Hyderabad
Rajkot
Nagpur
lawyers in Dhaka
lawyers in Dubai

Copyright Registration

Ph no: 9891244487

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi - Ph no: 9650499965

Home | Bare Acts | Law Forms | Supreme Court Judgments | Legal Advice | Lawyers | Submit article | Sitemap | Contact Us

legal Service India.com is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) 2000-2017
Get Free legal Advice here from top notch lawyers in India