Online Copyright Registration in India

Protect your creative work
Books, Songs, film, websites, Software, painting, fashion Design etc
Call now: 09891244487

Ask Our legal Experts, on issues related to Divorce

File Mutual Consent divorce right away

Call at ph no: 9650499965
  Search On:Laws in IndiaLawyers Search

To Appeal before CIC - Central Information Commission
For Filing and Hearing contact: Choudhury's law Office
Ph no: 8851046564

Author Topic: sec 83 IPC  (Read 961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alf

  • Newlaw
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Welcome to legal Service India - law forum for free legal Information
    • View Profile
sec 83 IPC
« on: November 07, 2017, 03:20:08 AM »
Hello. I had a few questions regarding section 83 IPC: Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.

Q1)  what happens in case of a person who is 12 years of age when committing the act, will he still be able to use this section in his favour? Example: a person was born on 1 june 2000 and he committed an act on 1 May 2013, i.e one month shy of turning 13; will the defense under section 83 still be available to him?

Q2)  Supposing a person committed an act of theft when he was 8 years of age, but the theft got discovered when he was 19 years of age? How will the court find out that he did not have sufficient maturity at the time of the act?

Thanks.

Offline kalaskarkk

  • Veteran at Law
  • *****
  • Posts: 326
  • Karma: +4/-0
  • Welcome to legal Service India - law forum for free legal Information
    • View Profile
Re: sec 83 IPC
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2017, 03:40:30 AM »
Dear Sir,

I would like to justify with the following information"


Section 82 says nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age and Section 83 says nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.

Law of exemption from criminal liability in the case of minors


These two sections lay down a rule which owing to its origin in the civil law, had long since become established in the criminal systems of all civilized countries. In English Common Law, a child below seven years of age cannot be guilty of any criminal offence whatever may be evidence as to its possessing a guilty state of mind in the ordinary course of nature.

A person of such age is absolutely incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong. He is absolutely doli incapax. Indian law on this point is the same. If a child is accused of an offence under the Code, proof of the fact that he was at the time below 7 years of age is ipso facto an answer to the prosecution.

The circumstances of a case may disclose such a degree of malice as to justify the maxim miltia supplet actatem (Malice supplied defect of years).

The privilege of a child aged between 10 to 14, is absolute under English law, while it is qualified in India. According to the English law an infant between the age of ten and fourteen years is presumed to be doli incapax.

But under this Code, if the accused is above seven years of age and under twelve, the incapacity to commit an offence only arises when the child has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequences of his conduct and such non-attainment would have apparently, to be specially pleaded and pursued, like the incapacity of a person who at the time of doing an act charged as an offence, was alleged to have been of unsound mind whether really the child in question possesses sufficient maturity of understanding is a matter to be inferred by the Court from the facts and circumstances of the case.

In England it is a presumption of law regarding the sexual offences that a boy below fourteen years cannot be guilty of rape. In India, however, the presumption of English law has no application and therefore boy of twelve years may be convicted of attempt to commit rape.

A minor girl aged more than 12 years can be guilty of an offence so long as her case is not covered by Sections 82 and 83 of the Code. Any offence punishable under the Code including an offence punishable under Section 408 can be committed by a person more than 12 years of age. Criminal liability is quite distinct from civil liability. A person may be criminally liable even though he may not be civilly liable.

Illustrations:

(i) A child of 9 years of age took a necklace valued at Rs. 2/8/- from another boy and immediately sold it to another for five annas, the child was discharged under this section, but the accused was convicted of receiving stolen property for the court considered convict displaying sufficient intelligence to hold him guilty.

(ii) The accused, a girl of 10 years of age, a servant of the complainant, picked up his button worth eight annas and gave it to her mother. She was convicted and sentenced to a month’s imprisonment. But the High Court quashed the conviction holding that there was no finding by the Magistrate that the accused had attained maturity of understanding sufficient to judge the nature of her act.

In Marsh v. Loader the defendant caught a child while stealing a piece of wood from his premises and gave into custody. Since the child was under the age of 7 years, he was discharged.

In case of Krishna Bhagwan v. State of Bihar, Patna High Court upheld that if a child who is accused of an offence during the trial, has attained the age of 7 years or at the time of decision the child has attained the age of 7 years can be convicted if he is able to understand the nature of the offence.

Burden of Proof:

The non-attainment of sufficient maturity of understanding would have to be specially pleaded and proved. The onus is on the person who claims and the benefit of the general exception to prove the circumstances which entitle him to exception.

In other words under Section 83 maturity of understanding is to be presumed in case of such children, unless the negative be proved by the defence; while under English law in the case of a child between ten to fourteen years, incapacity to commit the crime is to be presumed unless the contrary be proved by prosecution.


Regards:

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar
Retd Judge and Advocate
No.74, 1st Floor, “Disley”  House,
Malleswaram, Bengaluru-560003. Karnataka.
Mob: 9686971935, 080-23461189
kalaskarnetra@gmail.com
Regards:

Kishan Dutt Kalaskar
Retd Judge and Advocate
No.74, 1st Floor, “Disley”  House,
Malleswaram, Bengaluru-560003.
Mob: 9686971935, 080-23461189
kalaskarnetra@gmail.com
Call me for clarification

Offline durgaprasadzone

  • Newlaw
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Welcome to legal Service India - law forum for free legal Information
    • View Profile
    • SEO USA

Free legal Advice - lawyers Forum

Re: sec 83 IPC
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2018, 12:00:41 PM »

 

File a Consumer Complaint
Property verification
Call: 9873628941
 

Lawyers in India - Listed city wise Mumbai
Bangalore
Pune
Pondicherry
Jaipur
lawyers in London
lawyers in Birmingham
Chennai
Allahabad
Ahmedabad
Jodhpur
Indore
lawyers in Toronto
lawyers in Sydney

Cochin
Lucknow
Ranchi
Thane
Janjgir
lawyers in Milan
Johannesburg

Delhi - New Delhi
Chandigarh
Surat
Nashik
lawyers in New York
los Angeles
Kolkata
Hyderabad
Rajkot
Nagpur
lawyers in Dhaka
lawyers in Dubai

Copyright Registration
Ph no: 9891244487

For Mutual consent Divorce in Delhi
-Ph no: 9650499965

Home | Bare Acts | Law Forms | Supreme Court Judgments | Legal Advice | Lawyers | Submit article | Sitemap | Contact Us

legal Service India.com is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) © 2000-2018
Get Free legal Advice here from top notch lawyers in India