Abstract
From Article 14’s principle of equal treatment, emerged a doctrine named ‘manifest arbitrariness’ crafted by courts to overturn unchecked government actions and sweeping laws.
This article examines the concept of ‘manifest arbitrariness’ as applied by the Supreme Court of India under Article 14 of the Constitution. Though the term is absent from the Constitution, judicial decisions have used it to invalidate legislation and executive action that appear capricious, disproportionate, or lacking a determinative principle. Starting with the landmark case of E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu in 1974, moving through Shayara Bano v. Union of India in 2017, then Joseph Shine v. Union of India in 2018, followed by the Association for Democratic Reforms case on electoral bonds in 2024, and recent arbitration rulings in 2025, this doctrine evolves from philosophical principle to stylistic weapon. Far from a formal test, manifest arbitrariness operates as an interpretive style where tone and principle carry more force than rigid logic. Its expressive weight invokes deeper constitutional values when laws lack determinative clarity. While enabling vital oversight, predictability concerns persist; hybrid standards could ensure clearer application. From constitutional silence to modern judgments’ rhetorical core, it reveals Article 14’s evolving grammar.

Introduction – The Constitutional Framework of Right to Education The right to education stands as…

Abstract This particular research tries to analyze the relationship between two beautiful, diverse and dynamic…

Introduction The doctrines of delay and laches occupy a crucial position in Indian jurisprudence, particularly…

Origin and Meaning: “Dura Lex Sed Lex” is a Latin maxim that translates to “the…

This article examines the growing problem of pollution in India form a constitutional law prespective. It analyses the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, the judicial recognitation of the right to clean environment, and the challanges in enforcing environmental rights.

Social Justice: A Legal And Moral Principle Social justice is something which refers to the…

Abstract Judicial delays in India are a persistent challenge, undermining the right to timely justice…

The Law Helps the Vigilant, Not the Sleepy The Latin legal maxim Vigilantibus non dormientibus…

Introduction The right to privacy has emerged as a cornerstone of constitutional jurisprudence in India…

The insertion of the word “Secular” into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution through the Forty-Second Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 remains one of the most debated developments in Indian constitutional history. Introduced during the period of Internal Emergency, the amendment has often been questioned for its political context and legitimacy. This article examines whether the introduction of “Secular” represented a fundamental shift in constitutional philosophy or merely a formal recognition of an already existing constitutional principle. By analysing the historical background of the amendment, the constitutional status of the Preamble, and landmark Supreme Court judgments, the article argues that secularism was always implicit in the Indian Constitution and was later made explicit through the amendment. It concludes that the Forty-Second Amendment did not create secularism but reaffirmed it as an integral part of India’s constitutional identity.

Introduction: When Power Changes Hands In 1986, food inspectors across Punjab began prosecuting vendors under…

Petition Question The question raised in the petition was that, whether Chapter 22 of UP…

Introduction: Law as a Dynamic and Evolving Institution Law is often perceived as a fixed…

Introduction The question of whether writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India…

Introduction Articles 226 and 227 of the Indian Constitution establish distinct yet complementary powers of…

Judgments Contrary to Binding Precedent It is common knowledge that sometimes Courts pass judgments which…

Introduction On December 15, 2025, the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court delivered a…

Introduction Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging orders of the National Consumer…

Casus Omissus: Meaning, Origin, and Constitutional Context The Latin maxim casus omissus—literally “a case omitted”—serves…