- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- Woman Law
- Logical Discrepancy as a Ground for Voter Deletion during SIR in West Bengal: A Legal Analysis
- Analyzing the Landmark Judgment: Budhadev Karmakar v. State of West Bengal (2022) – A Step Towards Dignity for Sex Workers in India
- NVRA-Style Protections: State Bears a Heavy Burden Before Removing a Voter from the Rolls
- Procedural Separation in Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition
- Balancing Registration Rights and Prior User Goodwill
- Category I, II And III AIFS: Legal Distinctions
- Impact Of Article 13 On Pre-Constitutional Laws In The Context Of Recent Supreme Court Judgments
- The Shield Against Arbitrary Disenfranchisement: An Analysis of Lal Babu Hussein v. Electoral Registration Officer (1995)
Intellectual Property
Patents Act, 1970 — Sections 14, 15, 25(1) and Rule 55(5) — Examination and pre-grant opposition — Distinct and independent proceedings — Requirement of separate hearings where objections or prior art differ — Composite order must demarcate examination and opposition findings — Mechanical adoption of opponent’s submissions vitiates order — Violation of natural justice warrants remand to different Controller for fresh consideration — Appeal allowed.
Held: Where FER objections and opposition grounds are not identical and new prior art is introduced in opposition, separate hearings under Sections 14 and 25(1) are mandatory. Controller must independently apply mind and provide reasons. Pre-grant opponent has no locus in examination proceedings. Matter remanded for de novo consideration with liberty to all parties on merits
Introduction The batch of appeals decided by the Division Bench…
Introduction The Delhi High Court in a detailed Division Bench…
Mangalam Organics Ltd Vs N Ranga Rao And Sons Pvt Ltd Commercial IP Suit No.…
Background Amgen, a U.S.-based company that makes medicines from natural substances like proteins, created a…
Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a powerful tool that…
Anugraha Castings & Anr. Vs. Anugraha Valve Castings Limited Order Date: 22.08.2025 | Case Number:…
AI can now make things that look like they were made by humans like art, music, stories, code, designs, and even new inventions. This raises a big question: who should own these creations, and why?
Courts and governments are trying to decide rules about authorship, originality, ownership, and copying. The challenge is to support human creators while also allowing AI to grow responsibly.
To make this work, we need clear rules about how AI uses training data, what counts as fair use and how licensing works.
These rules should be supported worldwide to protect creativity, attract investment, stop misuse, and let AI help humans instead of replacing them.
Copyright FAQ for Creators in India 📌 Protect your creative work today!Copyright your creative work…
Case Summary – Vaidya Rishi India Health Pvt. Ltd. vs. Suresh Dutt Parashar & Ors.…
Copyright Act, 1957 – Overview The Copyright Act is a cornerstone of intellectual property law,…
Mankind Pharma Ltd. v. Ram Kumar M/S Dr. Kumars Pharmaceuticals Introduction This case study analyses…
Condor Footwear (India) Limited & Anr. v. Nexgen Footwear Private Limited & Ors. Date of…
Trademark Registration in India: A Complete Guide for 2025 In a fast-paced and competitive market,…
Cargill Incorporated Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks – Case Study Introduction This legal case study…
Moral Rights and Copyright in India In our fast-paced digital era, where creative endeavors effortlessly…
Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited Vs Kulbir Singh & Anr. Case Number: C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 191/2024…
Champion Project Enterprises Vs Union of India & Ors — Case Summary High Court of…
Copyright law is a key part of intellectual property rights. Its purpose is to protect…
You’ve built a brand, you have an identity, but before filing your trademark, have you…
Copyright Infringement — Readability-Enhanced (Content Unchanged) At its core, taking someone’s original creative work without…
Copyright vs Patent — An Overview In the broad field of protecting new ideas and…
Vikrant Chemico Industries Pvt Ltd Vs Shri Gopal Engineering and Chemical Works Pvt Ltd &…
Editors Picks
How To Submit Your Article
- Click here to Register if you're a new user.
- Login if you've already registered.
- Once you're logged in, go to the dashboard and
Submit Your Article! ✍
Lawyers in India
Click on the link to search for lawyers in IndiaFile Copyright Registration
Protect Your Work Instantly – File Copyright Registration Now!File Caveat in Supreme Court
Instant Caveat Filing Done my Expert Lawyers from Supreme court, Quick and Cost effectiveFile Mutual Divorce In Delhi/NCR
Experience lawyers from Over 25 years find you the best Divorce Solution here.Recent Topics
Latest Posts
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

