- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Copyright Law
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Patent
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- SC Asks Centre & Assam to Reply on NRC Identity Cards: What It Means
- Political Banner Culture in India: Environmental Damage, Public Cost & Legal Issues
- Supplementary Charge Sheet and Further Investigation under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): Law, Procedure and Judicial Principles
- Preventive Arrest and Detention: Legal Framework, Safeguards, and Judicial Oversight
- Arrest under BNSS, 2023: Legal Framework, Procedure, and Constitutional Protections
- Police Remand under Section 187 BNSS: Procedure, Judicial Principles, and Practical Guidelines
- Understanding Your Legal Rights as a Consumer in India
- Bail Jurisprudence under the BNSS: A Comparative Analysis of Regular, Anticipatory, Statutory (Default), and Interim Bail
Intellectual Property
N. Ranga Rao & Sons Private Ltd. Vs. Sree Annapoorna Agro Foods – Protection of Well-Known Marks on Dissimilar Goods Introduction The protection of…
Cipla Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.: Trademark Restoration,…
TV Today Network vs. Saurashtra Aaj Tak and Anr. –…
Introduction The judgement delivered by the Bombay High Court in Marico Limited vs. Minolta Natural…
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Delhi in Dabur India Limited v. Emami…
Introduction The decision delivered by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Mr…
Introduction The decision of the Delhi High Court in Neurocentria Inc. v. Deputy Controller of…
Introduction The Calcutta High Court has highlighted the principle of estoppel in interim injunction matters.…
Introduction In a clear and practical ruling on territorial jurisdiction in intellectual property disputes, the…
Introduction The Right to Information Act, 2005, aims to promote transparency while balancing the duties…
Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope Of Regional Director’s Power Under Section 16 Of Companies Act…
Introduction The judgement delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Firoz A…
Indiamart Inter Mesh Limited Vs OpenAI Inc. and Ors.: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark AI Governance…
Introduction In this judgment concerning patent opposition proceedings in the agrochemical sector, the Delhi High…
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Karnataka in Mr Santosh Kumar R.S. vs…
Introduction The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Bharat Bhogilal…
The Delhi High Court in Baldev Singh v. Godran Rubber Plastic Industries, 1999 SCC OnLine Del 329, held that although amendments of pleadings should generally be liberally allowed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, courts cannot permit amendments that introduce a completely inconsistent case or seek to withdraw clear admissions previously made in pleadings and related proceedings. The Court observed that judicial admissions carry substantial value and can only be withdrawn upon satisfactory explanation of inadvertent mistake. Since the plaintiff sought to alter the foundation of the suit by introducing a contradictory plea of prior user after previously denying such use, the amendment application was dismissed with costs.
Moral Rights Under Copyright Act, 1957 Introduction Moral rights are not directly mentioned in the…
Introduction 1.1 Background and Context Copyright law has historically evolved as a mechanism to protect…
Introduction This judgement delivered by the Patna High Court in Prashant Kishor vs The State…
In the current era, where content plays a very important role and everything revolves around…
Introduction The decision delivered by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Geobrugg AG v. Techfab…
Introduction There is an old saying in law and in life: he who comes to…
Latest Posts
How To Submit Your Article
- Click here to Register if you're a new user.
- Login if you've already registered.
- Once you're logged in, go to the dashboard and
Submit Your Article! ✍
Lawyers in India
Click on the link to search for lawyers in IndiaFile Copyright Registration
Protect Your Work Instantly – File Copyright Registration Now!File Caveat in Supreme Court
Instant Caveat Filing Done my Expert Lawyers from Supreme court, Quick and Cost effectiveFile Mutual Divorce In Delhi/NCR
Experience lawyers from Over 25 years find you the best Divorce Solution here.Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

