Abstract There are three type of civilizations they are called Kardashev scale. Type 1 designation…

Nuclear energy plays a significant role in India’s long-term energy security strategy. As a rapidly…

The Telecommunications Act, 2023 is a new law designed to update India’s telecom rules to…

For millions of Indians, the judicial system has long been an intimidating maze of procedures,…

Artificial Intelligence and Law in India Artificial Intelligence is transforming India, but what are the…

Disaster law is the branch of law that deals with how governments and institutions prevent,…

In late December 2025, news reports revealed something alarming: people could use Google’s Gemini and…

The 2025 amendments to Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules mark a subtle but significant shift in India’s takedown architecture: a single “authorised intimation” can now determine the fate of online speech. By replacing the ambiguous “actual knowledge” standard with a system of senior-level authorisation and reasoned notices, the government aims to curb arbitrary removals while equipping intermediaries with clearer legal cues. Yet the reforms also consolidate state discretion, introduce new bureaucratic layers, and leave users without meaningful avenues to contest takedowns. Positioned against global trends favouring transparency and user rights, India’s model remains executive-centric, raising pressing questions about proportionality, operational capacity, and the future of safe-harbour. This piece critically evaluates whether the new regime strengthens procedural accountability or merely streamlines state control over digital expression.

Introduction: The Long Shadow of Puttaswamy The trajectory of privacy jurisprudence in India has been…

Introduction On 14th November 2025, the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 was notified, and…

“Truth Is My God”: Confronting the Crime of Electricity Theft in India “Truth is my…

Smart Vacuum Cleaners and Legal Problems Smart vacuum cleaners are made to make life easier,…

SaaS Legal Risks for Indian Startups: Understanding Contracts and Compliance SaaS has not only changed…

Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most informativeness forces of the…

Abstract This study examines India’s digital transformation in the judicial sector, focusing on the eCourts…

Artificial Intelligence in Marketing and Branding Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming marketing and branding worldwide.…

Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession (2025) Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has swiftly evolved from…

Abstract The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the legal system, from judicial assistance to…

Mine-Protected Vehicles (MPVs) Mine-Protected Vehicles (MPVs), originally engineered as heavily armoured military transports for war…

This research paper critically examines the regulatory gap in India concerning AI, accountability, and corporate decision-making. By analyzing the adequacy of current legal frameworks—including the Companies Act of 2013, the Information Technology Act of 2000, and SEBI guidelines—alongside comparative insights from the European Union’s AI Act and U.S. corporate law, the paper seeks to illuminate the deficiencies in India’s present approach and propose pathways for reform. Employing a doctrinal methodology, the analysis draws from statutory instruments, judicial decisions, and academic literature, with particular attention to the intersection of legal liability, algorithmic bias, data protection, and corporate governance. The central thesis is that India’s legal infrastructure has yet to effectively address the accountability vacuum created by AI-driven decision-making in the corporate sphere. Consequently, legislative innovation, institutional reforms, and robust ethical oversight are urgently needed to bridge the regulatory gap while ensuring both innovation and accountability.