- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Inquiry under Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, from Fundamental Rights Perspective
- Is copyright registration mandatory in India? Debunking Myths
- Psychological, Legal & Financial Pressure on Husbands in Matrimonial Disputes in India
- Allahabad High Court Acquits 3 Men In 43-Year-Old Gang Rape Case Over Lack Of Evidence
- No Maintenance To The Wife Who Leaves Husband Without Valid Reason: Gujarat High Court
- Cyber Crime in India: Meaning, Types, Laws, Cases & Emerging Digital Threats (2025 Guide)
- 5 Expensive ISO 9001 Mistakes That Quietly Hurt Your Business Operations
- Calcutta High Court on Post-Poll Violence: Mamata Banerjee’s “Not A Bulldozer State” Remark Sparks Constitutional Debate
Author: Pratyasha Chaudhuri
🎖️ Recognition · Legal Author 📚 1 Published Articles
Motivated and detail-oriented law student pursuing an integrated BBA LL.B, combining strong business acumen with a deep understanding of legal frameworks. Skilled in research, analysis, and problem-solving, with internship experience in litigation and corporate law environments. Passionate about applying legal knowledge to real-world business and compliance challenges. Open to opportunities where I can contribute, learn, and grow while delivering value through a blend of legal insight and strategic thinking
This research paper critically examines the regulatory gap in India concerning AI, accountability, and corporate decision-making. By analyzing the adequacy of current legal frameworks—including the Companies Act of 2013, the Information Technology Act of 2000, and SEBI guidelines—alongside comparative insights from the European Union’s AI Act and U.S. corporate law, the paper seeks to illuminate the deficiencies in India’s present approach and propose pathways for reform. Employing a doctrinal methodology, the analysis draws from statutory instruments, judicial decisions, and academic literature, with particular attention to the intersection of legal liability, algorithmic bias, data protection, and corporate governance. The central thesis is that India’s legal infrastructure has yet to effectively address the accountability vacuum created by AI-driven decision-making in the corporate sphere. Consequently, legislative innovation, institutional reforms, and robust ethical oversight are urgently needed to bridge the regulatory gap while ensuring both innovation and accountability.
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

