Uniform Civil Code or UCC in short ,if brought into action, will make one law for India regarding the personal matters thus no requirement of the personal laws of different religions while passing a judgment. As of late, Delhi High Court supported Uniform Civil Code, saying' courts have been repeatedly confronted with the conflicts that arise in personal laws '. Uniform Civil Code is all around requested - yet very little comprehended. As you most likely are aware, Uniform Civil Code is a mixture of religious and financial issues, so every chosen government has been wary about it.  India as of now has a Uniform Criminal Code.

That, Law will pass judgment on all individuals similarly. So regardless of whether the religion of the criminal has various disciplines in their own laws still the criminal will be punished by the Uniform Criminal Code. A similar Uniform Civil Code is Being demanded. Personal laws can be of strict practices and customs and thus A uniform law can be a wayout for it. For Hindus: personal law is utilized in legacy, business, marriage, Inheritance, adoption, and the most significant the Hindu undivided family, which Experts say has become a tool to evade taxes. For Muslims: individual law is utilized in legacy, marriage, dower, separate, and so on. 
 
At the point when Uniform Civil Code will be carried out, one Ambedkar had always wanted will be satisfied. That, ladies and minorities will get security. it will also make legal process more simpler. At present, an understanding of both the Hindu Code Bill and Shariyah Law is required. different matters require in-depth knowledge of each personal law. On the off chance that Uniform Civil Code be applied in the future, one legitimate umbrella will cover the two individuals. Simply speaking: Uniform Civil Code implies ‘One Nation, One Legislation'. 
  
interestingly, as indicated by Article 25 -'Subject to public request, ethical quality, and wellbeing and different arrangements of this Part, all people are similarly qualified for an opportunity of soul and the right openly to purport, rehearse and spread religion'. Thus every Indian is free to choose and practice his religion and government cannot interfere with religious matters.

At the point when Constitution was being drafted, Uniform Civil Code prompted an incredible discussion if it ought to be remembered for Fundamental Rights. This means one personal law for the aggregate of India. By a larger part of 5-4, it was chosen by Fundamental Rights Committee, driven by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, that Uniform Civil Code not be incorporated. Thus, Uniform Civil Code is the underdog to the Right to Freedom of religion - it isn't Fundamental. Since it was obvious to drafters of the Constitution that execution of the Uniform Civil Code will not be simple for a huge nation like India. Thus Right to Personal laws was put under the concurrent list.
 
 4 Hindu Code Bills were passed during the 1950s which prompted the modernization of Hindu Personal Law.however such massive changes for modernization were not introduced ,till recent triple Talaq judgment in the muslim personal law. The Law Commission of India, in its report ‘reform in family law' has kept up with that ‘Uniform Civil Code is neither essential nor desirable'. Since our nation is excessively diversified for one law.
 
If the Law Commission doesn't consider the Uniform Civil Code fundamental. Is it really required in India? Hypothetically, Uniform Civil Code is required in India .  On 7 July, Delhi High Court pushed for Uniform Civil Code, saying 'The shackles of religion, caste, and society are gradually disappearing. The Supreme Court likewise upheld Uniform Civil Code, as in 1985 in the well-known Shah Bano Begum case stating' In article 44, the state will get for its residents Uniform Civil Code'.

Recently the Delhi High Court in Satprakash Meena vs Alka Meena, the petitioner filed for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act and the respondent challenged the applicability of the Hindu marriage act,1955 as both the petitioner and the respondent are from a tribal Meena community and according to sec 2(2) of the act, the laws under Hindu Marriage Act do not apply to them. The court thus stated that the Uniform Civil code is very important to resolve such disputes.  
 
Concluding remarks
Execution of the Uniform Civil Code ought to be directed calmly and bit by bit. Not just personal law for the minorities, the Hindu personal law will likewise change. Hindu Undivided Family practice - a tax-evading device - will accordingly stop existing. Uniform Civil Code should profit ladies the most. Ladies are respected substandard compared to men by the individual laws.

In the terms of progression, legacy, and marriage. As indicated by Muslim individual law, men can wed multiple times however ladies can't. Why not? Regardless of different modernizations in Hindu individual law, a young lady isn't considered by the parents once married. By Uniform Civil Code, family issues regarding marriage, Inheritance, divorce will be simplified because different personal laws make it complicated.

Individual family laws exist outside India as well and there are no models of Uniform Civil Codes for Indian Situation. Thus, If the Uniform civil Code is to be implemented then its repercussions must be checked thoroughly.