Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 stipulates that contracting parties must possess legal competence, and Section 11 specifies that minors lack such competence. Due to the Contract Act...

To create a comprehensive analysis of the deficiencies in India's income tax laws, a thorough examination of various aspects is required, including legal frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, com...

In the Islamic belief system, the severity of the offense of murder is accentuated by the principles detailed in the Quran and the Hadiths, which serve as fundamental sources of guidance for Mu...

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to advance rapidly, concerns about its alignment with legal and ethical frameworks become increasingly relevant. This essay analyses the intricate issu...

The legal framework for nuclear reactors is complex and crucial for guaranteeing the secure and responsible management of nuclear facilities. These laws encompass a wide array of rules, standar...

Definition: Termination of the contractual relationship between parties is known as Discharge of Contract. This occurs when the rights and obligations established by the contract reach their c...

When an investigative agency becomes biased, its consequences extend far and wide, threatening the very foundation of democracy, rule of law, and public trust in institutions. Such bias erodes ...

Cyber vandalism, also known as electronic vandalism, is the malicious act of deliberately disrupting, damaging, or defacing electronic systems, networks, or digital assets. This encompasses a b...

When certain severe offenses, like attempted murder (307 IPC) resulting in injury or grievous harm with dangerous means or weapons are involved, or if the injury is caused by acid attack, the o...

The capital punishment for drug offenses in Singapore is a polarizing topic that encompasses legal, ethical, and human rights considerations. Supporters advocate that it acts as a potent deterr...

Bail is an integral component of criminal justice systems globally, balancing the rights of defendants against society's need for justice and protection. Within this framework, the case diary s...

Culpability is a cornerstone of criminal law, determining the extent of responsibility assigned to an individual for their criminal actions. This essay will explore the complexities of culpabil...

The connection between media owners and the content of media is not a simple matter but a puzzle, so to judge it one needs to consider power struggles, influence, subjectivity, and public benef...

Islamic law, commonly known as Sharia Law, has had a significant impact on modern legal systems, particularly in countries with Muslim majorities. It plays a crucial role in defining family, co...

Theft (Section 378 IPC)According to Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Theft is intentionally removing any movable property from the possession of its rightful owner without their cons...

Obtaining bail in Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 cases poses complexities due to the gravity of the alleged offenses and the restrictive nature of the legislation. PMLA's objec...

The foundation of democracy rests on the impartiality and integrity of its electoral processes. The Election Commission holds a crucial role in maintaining this integrity by overseeing election...

Deposit return schemes (DRS) have gained widespread popularity as a mechanism to address environmental pollution resulting from single-use beverage containers. While their environmental benefit...

The act of filing a false rape accusation can lead to significant and extensive repercussions, affecting not only the accused individual but also society as a whole. Firstly, it is essential...

The SC/ST Act, or the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, was legislated to counteract the longstanding injustices and prejudice experienced by underpriv...

The relationship between the First Information Report (FIR) and the Case Diary in the legal system is crucial to comprehending the process of criminal investigation and trial. These documents p...

A charge sheet is a legal document that summarizes the criminal charges filed against a person by law enforcement or prosecutors. It formally accuses the individual of specific offenses, provid...

The termination of an arrest warrant without its execution refers to the legal procedure that cancels or withdraws a court-issued warrant before the named individual is apprehended or arrested....

AI-related crimes refer to a wide array of illicit behaviours that leverage the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology. These offenses take advantage of AI systems to carry out...

Copyright laws have existed for a considerable period of time and have been adapted to meet current needs - an era of digital information. It is now easier than ever before to access and share ...

A warrant of arrest or arrest warrant is a document issued by a court or magistrate on the state's behalf that authorizes law enforcement officers to arrest, detain, or search and seize a perso...

The landscape of phone tapping spyware is rapidly evolving, with new technologies emerging continuously. Among the latest phone tapping spyware tools is Pegasus, a sophisticated malware develop...

Surrogacy is a reproductive arrangement where a woman carries and gives birth to a child for another individual or couple. In gestational surrogacy, a surrogate carries an embryo created using ...

Under Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, all individuals are eligible to provide testimony unless the court finds that they are unable to comprehend the questions posed to them or pr...

Consideration is defined under Section 2(d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as an act done or abstinence from an act or promise to be done or abstained from, at the desire of the promisor. Th...

In this American legal matter, a Texas law that banned abortions, except when necessary to preserve the mother's life, was contested for infringing upon the constitutional guarantee of liberty ...

An incised wound is a cut caused by a sharp-edged object, such as a knife or broken glass. It usually has clean, straight edges with minimal tissue damage, often resembling a surgical or intent...

Forensic odontology falls under the realm of forensic science, a specialized field that uncovers the identity of individuals through their dental records. The discipline delves into the scrutin...

A child still in the womb is unborn child. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 laws in India mention the unborn child and have created its legal identity by fi...

The Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 in India contains crucial safeguards, namely Section 437(2), that protect the rights of individuals accused or suspected of committing non-bailable offe...

The terms 'hurt,' 'wound,' and 'injury' are often used interchangeably to describe physical harm or damage to the body, but they have distinct meanings and usage. Describing pain in medical ter...

There are several reasons why some states choose not to join the International Criminal Court (ICC), including issues of sovereignty, jurisdiction, human rights violations concerns and biases. ...

International survival and development in the world arena are a complex problem that developing countries need to handle. Although every nation may have a specific situation, there are some pri...

The duty of defending an accused in court falls upon the shoulders of a defence lawyer. Let's delve into the basic manoeuvres and tacks that usually find their way to the defence attorney's pla...

In December 2019, the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was passed in our country, which offers a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan who...

A crucial step towards incorporating the WhatsApp messaging platform into Supreme Court proceedings was taken when Justice DY Chandrachud, Chief Justice of the Indian Supreme Court, announced i...

A contract of extradition or extradition treaty is a duly signed document that covenants two or more nations to help transfer individuals who are wanted or sentenced in connection with a crime ...

Determinations from postmortem investigations are essential in order to grant closure to families and friends of the deceased, as well as help facilitate subsequent legal proceedings. Criminal ...

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was enacted in 2002 as a crucial legal tool to combat money laundering and related offences in India. Its primary objective is to detect, investiga...

The United States wields its veto power in the UN Security Council to obstruct resolutions critical or against the interests of Israel, motivated by factors such as: Strategic alliance w...

Diverse constitutions across the globe differ in their structures, rights, and powers of governance. Ranging from the United States Constitution, whose provisions are elaborate, to the European...

Title IX is a comprehensive federal statute in the United States that prohibits discrimination based on sex in any educational program or activity that receives federal funding. Incorporated in...

The intricate relationship among news reporters, presenters, and media owners involves various forms of influence, both overt and covert. This analysis delves into the mechanisms by which media...

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is an essential part of the American legal system and national customs that have been formed for many years and have been evolving through...

Artificially generated media, known as deepfakes, has emerged as a major concern due to its potential to manipulate video, audio, and images using advanced technology like Artificial Intelligen...

Detecting media bias can be accomplished by observing various indications. These include biased reporting that presents a one-sided view, cherry-picking facts, using exaggerated or attention-gr...

Reinvestigation: The act of reinvestigation entails a thorough review and reconsideration of a previously completed investigation, with the intention of uncovering additional evidence or witne...

Jurisprudence, the philosophy and theory of law, and international law, the body of rules governing relations between states and other international actors, share a complex and symbiotic relati...

In Our Country Normally Murders Are Committed By: Sharp or blunt weapons, firearms, or explosives. Strangulation, throttling, or smothering. Poisoning. Burning. In any type of murder, ...

The Pinochet Case broke new ground by challenging long-standing beliefs about sovereign immunity and advocating for universal jurisdiction in cases of serious human rights violations. Unlike pa...

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has led to its remarkable capabilities, often surpassing human cognition in various areas. As AI continues to become more entwined in our s...

Medical Insanity:Medical insanity is a term used to describe serious mental disorders that greatly hinder a person's ability to think, feel, or behave normally. These disorders, such as schizop...

The independence, integrity, and effectiveness of the judiciary can be compromised by various sources, presenting threats to its proper functioning. There are numerous potential threats that c...

Objects of the Principles of Natural Justice:Natural justice, also referred to as procedural fairness, is a legal doctrine that covers the most important procedural rights to ensure impartial and...

The insanity defence, also known as legal insanity, is a highly debated and intricate component of criminal law. It requires an assessment of the defendant's mental state during the alleged off...

Although the Indian Penal Code, 1860 does not explicitly define 'intention', it is a crucial principle in criminal law that an individual cannot be found guilty of a crime without having intend...

Performing post-mortem examinations can be emotionally draining for both the pathologist and the family of the deceased. Striking a balance between the scientific investigation and showing resp...

The idea of ultra vires has its roots in ancient Rome. In the 19th century, it came to the fore in corporate law as a safeguard against corporations' actions beyond their objectives. This conce...

The execution of international laws is obstructed by various hindrances, such as the intricacies of independent nations, conflicting interests, and systemic obstacles. The desire for self-rule ...

Formal Science: In the context of "formal science," it typically refers to disciplines that are concerned with formal systems, abstract structures, and logical reasoning, rather than...

The notion of whether "law is blind" or has "opened its eyes" encapsulates a nuanced debate within legal philosophy and practice. It reflects ongoing discussions about the f...

A predicate offence is an unlawful act that forms a part of a more severe criminal act or organization. It acts as the foundation for additional illegal activities. A predicate offence is a fun...

In the legal case Bridges v. Hawkesworth, the plaintiff, Mr. Bridges, stumbled upon a significant amount of money at Mr. Hawkesworth's shop. Acting in good faith, Bridges entrusted the money to...

In 1932, the Supreme Court of the United States introduced the concept of prospective overruling in the case of Great Northern Railway v. Sunburst Oil and Refining Co. The Court asserted that i...

The 1884 legal case of R v. Dudley and Stephens is a well-known example of English criminal law. It involved a difficult and morally challenging situation. The case revolved around four individ...

The phrase 'Letter Rogatory' is derived from the Latin term 'rogatorius.' In the Latin language, 'rogatorius' translates to 'related to a request' or 'related to a petitioner.' Letter Rogatory,...

Tort and crime, two legal branches, are different because each of them deals with specific elements of wrongful behaviour as well as consequences for these. Tort law is mainly based on civil w...

John Austin, a 19th century British jurist, proposed a theory of sovereignty that has become a fundamental concept in both political theory and jurisprudence. This theory centres on the notion ...

International law, also known as the corpus juris, is composed of rules and principles that govern the relationships between states, international organizations, and sometimes individuals. It e...

A formal document known as an injury report is used to record the details of an individual's injury. This includes the date, time, location, and nature of the injury. The report can be created ...

A viscera report is compiled in order to establish the reason for death in cases where traditional autopsies are inconclusive. These examinations involve a thorough investigation of the viscera...

The term jus cogens, also known as a peremptory norm and meaning 'compelling law' in Latin, originated from customary international law and the general principles of law recognized by civilized...

Classic Example of Precedent as a Source of Law:One of the most notable illustrations of precedent as a source of law in the United States is the 'Brown v. Board of Education' (1954) case. It cal...

The presence of a seizure list witness is of utmost importance in the investigation and trial of a case, serving as a critical link between the evidence collected during the investigation and i...

Positive Law:Positive law is a collection of legal rules and principles that are officially enacted, recognized, and enforced by governmental authorities in a specific jurisdiction. It differs ...

Executive exerts influence over the judiciary including High Courts and Supreme Court through a variety of mechanisms, ranging from the appointment of judges to the shaping of judicial decision...

Final Report is submitted in cases where charge sheet could not be forwarded to the court after completion of investigation due to insufficient evidence or no evidence at all or false complaint...

The case of 'Ashby v. White' is a significant ruling in the history of English law, centred on the concept of electoral rights and the responsibility of public officials. This landmark case, de...

One of the vital factors that allow the judiciary to remain legitimate and function properly is protection of its independence and basing on law rather than personal politics. A commitment to j...

Trace evidence can be described as materials that are so minute that the human eye is not capable of perceiving them; however, they can transfer from one surface to another without being notice...

'An eye for an eye,' also called 'lex talionis,' which can be literally translated into Latin as the 'law of retaliation' or 'law of retribution,' is a principle that is often referred to when ...

The legal standard of proof known as 'preponderance of probability' is utilized in civil cases, requiring the evidence presented to demonstrate a greater likelihood that a fact is true. In simp...

Legally, a 'minor' is an individual who has not yet reached the age of majority, typically set at 18 years old in most legal systems. This age serves as a dividing line between childhood and ad...

Bail refers to the time a person charged with an offence can be set at liberty without staying in prison as they await their hearing in court. This decision of whether or not to grant bail is n...

According to the principle of judicial hierarchy, higher courts have authority over lower courts within the judicial system, and as such, lower courts are bound to follow the decisions and prec...

Police Malkhana:The Police Malkhana is a store for the safekeeping of confiscated, recovered stolen items, firearms, drugs, documents, and other evidence found in investigations. These are stor...

According to Section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the responsibility of proving the source of proceeds of crime falls on the accused. In cases where an individual is char...

Recognizing the signs and symptoms of drowning and drowning death is crucial in providing prompt intervention, potentially saving a person's life and find out the cause of death. While the medi...

The differences between police custody and judicial custody are given below: In police custody permission of the court is not required for interrogation of the accused person. In judicia...

Investigating agencies play a pivotal role in ensuring justice is served, as they are tasked with gathering evidence and presenting it in court. However, when investigating agencies omit statem...

When determining whether bail should be granted in a case that is typically non-bailable, judges and magistrates take into account a variety of factors and adhere to specific standards and crit...

One of the key roles of judges in a courtroom is to ensure that justice is served by impartially evaluating evidence and submissions presented by defence lawyers. Their assessment is guided by ...

The concepts of intention and motive are essential in the fields of law, psychology, and philosophy, each with its own distinct definitions and implications. It is vital to grasp the subtle dif...

Arrest by Private Person:Section 43 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has laid down the conditions under which a private person can effectuate an arrest to protect public tranquillity and en...

Cognizable Offence:Police officers have the authority to arrest without warrant and investigate without the permission of court for certain offences known as cognizable offences. These offences...