Judgments Contrary to Binding Precedent It is common knowledge that sometimes Courts pass judgments which are contrary to the binding…

Introduction The enduring doctrine that “tax and equity are strangers” encapsulates the judiciary’s commitment to literal and strict interpretation of…

Introduction On December 15, 2025, the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court delivered a judgment in The Authorised Officer,…

The relationship between ethnicity and assimilation is very important in discussions about cultural diversity, minority rights, and how states manage…

The Paradigmatic Rupture: From Colonial Control to Constitutional Justice The enactment of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 represents the…

India’s approach to arbitration is becoming more flexible and practical. Disputes involving fraud, intellectual property, and employment are no longer automatically excluded from arbitration. Instead, courts now examine whether the dispute concerns private contractual rights between parties or broader statutory rights that affect the public at large. This approach strengthens party autonomy while ensuring that matters of public interest remain protected. Overall, it shows India’s growing alignment with global pro-arbitration practices, even though some legal uncertainties still remain.

Introduction: The Bolam Principle in Medical Negligence Law In the intricate landscape of medical negligence law, the Bolam Principle stands…

Introduction: Civil Jurisprudence and the Law of Torts In the intricate tapestry of civil jurisprudence, the law of torts serves…

Tort Law and Civil Harmony Tort law serves as the silent guardian of civil harmony, providing a framework for redress…

Tortious Liability And The Doctrine Of Strict Liability In the intricate tapestry of civil law, the concept of Tortious Liability…