This article examines the copyrightability of AI-generated creative works under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. It analyses the distinction between fully autonomous and AI-assisted creations, the implications of human authorship and originality, and the significance of the Raghav AI (Ankit Sahni) case.

Introduction Copyright is not merely a legal mechanism for economic reward; it is a recognition of the intellectual, creative, and…

Protect your creativity the right way A registration is a powerful legal tool — but only when it is prepared…

Brief Introductory Note This case involves a dispute over copyright protection for artistic labels used in the edible oil business.…

Factual Background The case arises out of a legal challenge filed by Ms. Siddiqua Begum Khan, the daughter and surviving…

Fact: Honasa Consumer Ltd. vs Cloud Wellness Pvt. Ltd. The Plaintiff, Honasa Consumer Limited, is engaged in the marketing and…

Introduction The Copyright Act, 1957 forms the cornerstone of India’s intellectual property framework, ensuring legal protection for creative expression while…

Facts Everest Entertainment LLP, the plaintiff, claimed to be the sole and exclusive owner of the copyright and intellectual property…

In an era defined by the velocity of digital innovation and the transnational flow of creative works, India finds itself…