IPL Franchise, Player Contract, or Endorsement Dispute: Arbitration, Injunctions, and Image Rights

Introduction: When Cricket Contracts Turn Into High-Value Legal Disputes

Professional cricket is no longer just about runs, wickets and trophies. It is also a substantial commercial enterprise involving franchise agreements, player retainers, performance bonuses, sponsorship deals, brand endorsements, licensing arrangements and personal image rights.

Behind every major commercial association between a cricketer and a franchise or brand lies a contract. That contract determines what each party must deliver, when payment becomes due, how long commercial rights can be exercised, and what happens when the relationship breaks down.

Problems arise when a franchise allegedly withholds contractual payments, a player terminates an agreement, a sponsor continues using a cricketer’s image after the licence expires, or an agent claims commission on a deal concluded after the agency relationship has ended.

These disputes can escalate quickly. A delayed payment may become a question of contractual liability. An unauthorised advertisement may damage a player’s reputation. A disputed exclusivity clause may threaten an important sponsorship arrangement. In some situations, waiting for an ordinary trial or the completion of arbitration may cause commercial harm that is difficult to reverse.

This is where an IPL franchise player contract dispute requires a carefully planned legal response. The appropriate remedy depends on the contract, the evidence, the parties involved and the urgency of the situation.

Indian law provides several possible remedies, including arbitration, recovery proceedings, interim injunctions, damages and actions to protect personality rights. However, these remedies are not interchangeable. A claim for unpaid fees against a contracting party is legally different from a claim against an unrelated seller using a cricketer’s photograph without permission.

Having handled legal matters for many years, my view is straightforward: sports contracts should be drafted with the same care as any other high-value commercial agreement. When a dispute does arise, the first task is to identify the actual legal right at stake and select a remedy that can realistically protect it.

1. What Is an IPL Franchise Player Contract Dispute?

An IPL franchise player contract dispute arises when a professional cricketer, franchise or another contracting party disagrees about the interpretation, performance, termination or enforcement of a sports-related agreement.

The dispute may concern payment, contractual obligations, commercial rights or the consequences of ending a business relationship.

Common examples include:

• Unpaid player fees: A player claims that an agreed retainer, fee or contractual payment remains outstanding.
• Contract termination: A franchise or player disputes whether an agreement was lawfully terminated.
• Performance-related payments: The parties disagree about bonuses, incentives or other conditional payments.
• Endorsement breaches: A player or sponsor allegedly violates an exclusivity, advertising or usage restriction.
• Sports agent commissions: An agent claims payment under a representation or management agreement.
• Image rights violations: A company uses a cricketer’s name, image, voice or likeness without the required permission.
• Unauthorised merchandise: A seller markets products bearing a cricketer’s identity without appropriate authorisation.
• False endorsements: An advertisement or AI-generated video misleadingly suggests that a cricketer supports a product.

The first legal question is not simply who is right or wrong. It is whether the claim arises from a contract, an independent intellectual property right, a personality-rights interest or a combination of these.

That distinction determines whom to proceed against, which forum may have jurisdiction and what relief should be sought.

2. Which Indian Laws Govern Cricket Contract Disputes?

There is no single statute that resolves every dispute involving an IPL franchise, player, agent or sponsor. The applicable law depends on the agreement and the nature of the alleged breach.

2.1 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Arbitration is often an important option for commercial disputes arising from sports agreements.

Where a valid arbitration agreement covers the dispute, the parties may be required to resolve their contractual claims through arbitration rather than ordinary civil litigation on the merits.

The following provisions are particularly relevant:

The existence of an arbitration clause does not automatically mean that every related claim must go before the same tribunal. Its wording, scope, the identity of the parties and the nature of the right asserted must be examined.

For example, a player may have an arbitration agreement with a franchise over unpaid contractual fees. An unrelated online seller accused of misusing the player’s image ordinarily cannot be compelled to arbitrate merely because the player has an arbitration clause in a separate agreement.

2.2 Can a Court Grant an Urgent Injunction During Arbitration?

Yes, where the statutory requirements are satisfied.

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act allows a party to seek interim protection from a competent court in specified circumstances. Section 17 enables an arbitral tribunal to grant interim measures.

Suppose a sponsor continues to use a cricketer’s image after the relevant licence has expired. If the dispute falls within an applicable arbitration agreement, the player may consider contractual remedies and, where justified, urgent interim protection.

The correct procedure will depend on the parties, the arbitration clause, the urgency of the situation and the relief sought.

A Section 9 application is not a substitute for proving the underlying claim. The applicant must establish a proper legal basis for the requested protection.

2.3 Can a Contracting Party Avoid Arbitration by Filing a Civil Suit?

Not necessarily.

Section 8 may require a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration when the statutory conditions are met and a timely application is made. The court must examine the arbitration agreement and the dispute before it.

At the same time, an arbitration clause does not remove the jurisdiction of every court for every purpose. Applications for interim protection, statutory challenges and enforcement proceedings may still involve courts in the manner provided by the Act.

The legal strategy must therefore begin with a review of the agreement, including its dispute-resolution clause, seat of arbitration, governing law, appointment procedure and any applicable institutional rules.

3. What Happens When an IPL Franchise Fails to Pay a Player?

A dispute over unpaid player fees is primarily a question of contractual entitlement and evidence.

Consider a situation in which a player claims that a franchise has failed to pay an agreed amount. The franchise responds that the payment was conditional on certain contractual obligations or that the amount claimed is incorrect.

Neither side can establish its case merely by making an assertion.

The agreement must be examined to determine:

• The amount payable and the payment schedule.
• Whether the payment is fixed or conditional.
• Whether any performance requirements apply.
• Whether deductions, set-offs or adjustments are contractually permitted.
• Whether a notice or cure period must expire before proceedings begin.
• Whether the dispute falls within an arbitration clause.
• Whether any limitation period may affect the claim.

Relevant evidence may include the executed contract, amendments, payment records, invoices, correspondence, notices, performance records and admissions by the parties.

What Remedies May Be Available?

Depending on the contract and applicable law, a claimant may seek payment of the amount due, interest where legally justified, damages for a proven breach, or costs where recoverable.

If arbitration is required, the claimant should follow the agreed procedure and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

A demand notice may help clarify the amount claimed and give the other party an opportunity to resolve the matter. However, sending a notice does not guarantee recovery, and the notice must not overlook any contractual requirements.

An important distinction: An unpaid-fee dispute does not automatically justify an injunction against a franchise’s commercial activities. The claimant must establish a legal basis for the particular interim relief requested.

4. Contract Termination: Can a Player or Franchise Walk Away?

Termination disputes often turn on the precise language of the agreement.

A contract may provide for termination after a material breach, insolvency, failure to meet specified obligations or another defined event. It may also require prior notice and an opportunity to remedy the breach.

The parties should not assume that a disagreement automatically permits immediate termination.

Before terminating an agreement, the relevant questions include:

• Does the contract permit termination in the circumstances?
• Has a contractual termination event occurred?
• Is notice required?
• Does the agreement provide a cure period?
• What obligations survive termination?
• Are there restrictions on future endorsements, confidentiality or use of intellectual property?
• Does termination trigger compensation, repayment or other financial consequences?

The Specific Relief Act, 1963, and Sports Contract Remedies

The Specific Relief Act, 1963, is relevant to the remedies available for contractual breaches.

Section 10 addresses specific performance, subject to the Act’s provisions. Section 14 identifies contracts that cannot be specifically enforced. Section 38 concerns perpetual injunctions, while Section 41 identifies circumstances in which an injunction must or may be refused.

The statutory framework does not mean that every sports contract is automatically unenforceable or that every injunction is prohibited.

However, a court will not necessarily compel the continuation of a personal or commercial relationship merely because one party alleges a breach. The nature of the obligation and the relief sought matter.

Where appropriate, a claim for damages or other monetary relief may be more suitable than an attempt to force the parties to continue working together.

5. Can a Cricketer Obtain an Injunction Against Unauthorised Use of Their Image?

A cricketer’s commercial identity can have substantial economic value. Their name, image, voice, signature and recognisable likeness may be associated with sponsorships, advertisements, merchandise and other commercial opportunities.

Indian courts have recognised personality-rights interests in appropriate cases, particularly where a person’s identity is commercially appropriated or used in a misleading manner.

However, the existence and scope of a claim depend on the facts, the applicable law and the precise rights involved.

5.1 Yuvraj Singh v. Ashok Kumar

The reported decision Yuvraj Singh v. Ashok Kumar, cited as 2026 SCC OnLine Del 5464 and reportedly decided on 29 July 2026, is relevant to the protection of personality attributes against unauthorised commercial use.

Its significance for this article is the distinction between a claim protecting a person’s identity and a contractual claim for unpaid player fees.

A personality-rights proceeding should not be presented as a judgment deciding an IPL franchise’s payment obligations unless the actual judgment establishes that proposition.

The precise operative directions, procedural status and any subsequent developments should be checked against the official court record before publication or reliance in litigation.

5.2 Sunil Gavaskar v. Cricket Tak

The proceeding reported as Sunil Gavaskar v. Cricket Tak & Others, with an interim order reportedly dated 23 December 2025, is also relevant to disputes concerning a cricketer’s identity and alleged unauthorised commercial use.

An interim order must be distinguished from a final judgment. The relief granted at an interim stage does not necessarily determine every issue in the underlying case.

The exact case number, operative directions and subsequent procedural history should be verified from the official order before attributing a specific legal proposition to the court.

5.3 Other Relevant Personality-Rights Authorities

Several Delhi High Court decisions provide a broader legal framework for claims involving commercial identity and unauthorised exploitation.

These authorities should be used for the legal propositions they actually support. They do not automatically decide disputes involving IPL retainers, franchise termination or sports-agent commissions.

The applicable holding must be drawn from the judgment itself, with particular attention to whether the order was interim or final.

6. Image Rights, Copyright and Endorsement Agreements: Understanding the Difference

One of the most common mistakes in image-rights disputes is to treat copyright ownership and personality rights as if they were the same thing.

They are different legal interests.

Copyright in a photograph is governed by the Copyright Act, 1957. Ownership may depend on authorship, employment arrangements, assignments, licences and other applicable provisions.

A photographer or another copyright owner may possess rights in a photograph. Separately, the person depicted may have legal grounds to challenge certain unauthorised or misleading commercial uses of their identity.

For example, a company may obtain a photograph from a lawful source but still face a legal challenge if it uses the image to suggest a commercial endorsement that was never authorised.

Conversely, a cricketer’s objection to a photograph does not automatically establish that the cricketer owns its copyright.

Key Legal Questions in Image-Rights Disputes

The relevant questions include:

• Who owns the copyright in the photograph?
• Was the photograph lawfully obtained?
• Is there a licence governing its use?
• Does the licence permit advertising, merchandise or social-media promotion?
• Is the cricketer’s identity being used in a misleading commercial context?
• Does the use exceed the duration, territory or purpose of an existing agreement?

The Trade Marks Act, 1999, may also become relevant where a registered mark, a protected sign or a legally sustainable passing-off claim is involved.

No single cause of action should be assumed to apply to every unauthorised image-use dispute.

7. What If a Sponsor Continues Using a Cricketer’s Image After the Contract Expires?

An expired endorsement agreement can create a serious commercial problem, particularly if the sponsor continues running advertisements or selling promotional merchandise.

The first step is to examine the licence and the provisions dealing with expiry and termination.

A contract may permit certain materials to remain available for a defined sell-off period or may require the sponsor to remove all promotional material immediately upon expiry. The wording determines the parties’ contractual obligations.

Key Provisions to Review in an Endorsement Agreement

The review should cover:

• The duration of the image licence.
• The permitted advertising channels.
• The products and services covered.
• The territory in which the image may be used.
• Any post-expiry transition period.
• The removal of advertisements and digital content.
• Restrictions on archival material and existing inventory.
• Any continuing confidentiality or intellectual property obligations.

Legal Remedies for Unauthorised Image Use

If continued use appears unauthorised, the cricketer may consider a contractual demand, a claim for monetary relief, an injunction or other proceedings supported by the facts.

Where arbitration applies, the availability of interim relief under Sections 9 and 17 must also be considered.

An urgent application should identify the specific material complained of, the legal right being protected and the harm likely to arise if the material remains in circulation.

8. Unauthorised Merchandise and AI-Generated False Endorsements

Digital platforms have made it easier to distribute products, photographs and videos at scale. They have also made it easier to create misleading commercial content using a person’s identity.

8.1 Unauthorised Merchandise

Suppose an online seller markets T-shirts, posters or phone covers featuring a cricketer’s photograph without permission.

The legal position will depend on the rights involved.

Potential issues include personality rights, copyright in the photograph, passing off and applicable trade mark rights. The relevant claim must be supported by evidence rather than assumed from the mere presence of a famous person’s image.

Useful evidence may include:

• Product listings and screenshots.
• Seller information and purchase records.
• Advertisements.
• Proof of the relevant rights or authorisations.

Where appropriate, legal action may seek removal of the listings, an injunction, damages or other available relief.

8.2 AI-Generated False Endorsements

Consider a video that uses AI-generated imagery or a synthetic voice to make it appear that a cricketer endorses a financial product, betting service or consumer brand.

If the representation is unauthorised and misleading, the affected person may have grounds to explore personality-rights, passing-off, contractual or other claims, depending on the circumstances.

The use of AI does not by itself establish liability. The content, commercial purpose, deception, applicable rights and available evidence must be examined.

A practical response should include:

• Preserving the original video, URLs and relevant screenshots.
• Recording the date, time and platform on which the content appeared.
• Retaining advertisements, engagement information and purchase or payment links where available.
• Documenting any false statements or apparent endorsement claims.
• Sending an appropriately framed platform complaint or legal notice.
• Assessing whether urgent judicial relief is justified.
• Identifying the responsible parties and any additional remedies supported by the evidence.

Applicable provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and relevant intermediary rules should be considered where they materially apply. The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, may also be relevant to the admissibility and proof of electronic records.

It is important not to assume that every deepfake automatically violates a particular statutory provision. The legal basis must be identified for the specific content and conduct.

9. Sports Agent Commission Disputes

Sports agents and talent management agencies often negotiate endorsements, sponsorships and commercial appearances on behalf of players.

Disputes may arise when a player terminates an agency agreement and the agent subsequently claims commission on a deal completed after termination.

The answer depends on the contract.

An agent may have a claim if the agreement expressly provides for commission on deals negotiated during the agency period, transactions substantially developed before termination or payments received after termination. The precise wording is critical.

The following matters should be examined:

• The commission percentage and calculation method.
• Whether commission is payable on signed contracts or money actually received.
• The scope of the agent’s authority.
• Any exclusivity arrangement.
• Termination rights and notice requirements.
• Post-termination commission provisions.
• The treatment of renewals, extensions and repeat endorsements.
• The applicable dispute-resolution clause.

A former agent cannot establish an entitlement merely by asserting that they once represented the player. Equally, termination does not necessarily extinguish every commission entitlement that validly accrued under the agreement.

The claim must be assessed against the contract, the agent’s actual work and the applicable law.

10. Breach of Exclusivity in Endorsement Agreements

An exclusivity clause may prevent a cricketer from endorsing competing products during a specified period.

But the scope of that restriction must be established from the agreement.

For example, an agreement relating to a particular sportswear product does not necessarily prohibit every commercial association with every business that sells clothing or sporting goods.

The contract may define exclusivity by product category, territory, duration, competing brands or specified commercial activities.

A dispute may also arise if the parties disagree about whether a particular product falls within the restricted category or whether the player obtained the required consent.

Before alleging a breach, the parties should examine:

• The exact wording of the exclusivity clause.
• The products and brands covered.
• The contractual period and geographical scope.
• Any exceptions or prior approvals.
• The alleged competing endorsement.
• The contractual consequences of a breach.
• Applicable notice, cure and termination provisions.

The remedy must be proportionate to the contractual right and supported by the evidence. A claim for damages, a contractual notice or an injunction may be appropriate in different circumstances, but none should be treated as automatic.

11. Which Legal Remedy Is Appropriate for Each Dispute?

The following table provides a practical starting point. The correct forum and remedy will ultimately depend on the agreement, the parties and the applicable law.

The existence of a potential remedy does not guarantee that a court or tribunal will grant it. Jurisdiction, contractual terms, evidence, limitation and the applicable legal standards remain decisive.

12. Step-by-Step Legal Action Checklist

A structured approach can prevent avoidable mistakes and improve the prospects of an efficient resolution.

1. Step 1: Obtain the complete agreement. Collect the signed contract, amendments, schedules, licences and any relevant side letters.
2. Step 2: Identify the precise breach. Separate payment claims from termination disputes, image-rights complaints and other contractual issues.
3. Step 3: Check the dispute-resolution clause. Review arbitration requirements, governing law, seat, jurisdiction and appointment procedures.
4. Step 4: Preserve the evidence. Retain contracts, emails, payment records, advertisements, screenshots, relevant URLs and communications.
5. Step 5: Calculate the claim. Identify the amount due, the contractual basis for recovery and any supporting calculations.
6. Step 6: Review notice requirements. Check whether a demand notice, breach notice or cure period is required before commencing proceedings.
7. Step 7: Assess urgency. Determine whether ongoing conduct is causing harm that may justify interim protection.
8. Step 8: Choose the appropriate forum. Consider arbitration, court proceedings, platform complaints or other legally available routes, depending on the claim.
9. Step 9: Draft the relief carefully. Identify the precise payment, injunction, declaration or other order sought and the legal basis for it.
10. Step 10: Evaluate settlement. Consider whether a negotiated resolution can protect the client’s commercial interests without unnecessary delay and expense.
11. Step 11: Check limitation and enforcement. Do not allow negotiations or repeated correspondence to create a false sense of security about limitation periods.
12. Step 12: Plan for compliance. Where an award, settlement or injunction is obtained, consider the steps needed to implement and enforce it.

13. Why Early Legal Advice Matters

Sports-related commercial disputes often involve more than the amount of money immediately in question.

A poorly managed dispute may affect sponsorship negotiations, future commercial opportunities, contractual relationships and the value of a player’s brand.

Early legal review can help identify contractual weaknesses, preserve important evidence, assess the appropriate forum and avoid remedies that are unlikely to succeed.

For a franchise, that may mean resolving a payment dispute before it disrupts a wider commercial relationship. For a cricketer, it may mean protecting an endorsement licence or challenging unauthorised use of their identity. For an agent, it may mean establishing whether a commission claim survives termination.

The objective should be to protect the client’s legal position while remaining realistic about cost, time, evidence and the commercial consequences of litigation.

Conclusion

An IPL franchise player contract dispute can involve unpaid fees, termination, sponsorship obligations, agency commissions or the unauthorised commercial use of a cricketer’s identity. Although these matters may arise within the same sporting ecosystem, they do not necessarily raise the same legal questions.

Arbitration may provide an effective route for contractual disputes where a valid agreement applies. Injunctions may be important where the legal requirements for urgent protection are satisfied. Personality-rights and intellectual property claims may offer separate remedies when a cricketer’s identity or protected material is used without proper authorisation.

The most effective legal response begins with the contract, the evidence and the precise right that requires protection. A carefully drafted agreement and timely legal advice can help parties avoid unnecessary disputes and respond more effectively when disagreements arise.

Facing an IPL Player Contract, Cricket Endorsement or Image Rights Dispute? Protect Your Commercial Interests Before It Is Too Late.

Your reputation is your brand. Your contract is your protection. Don’t let a contractual breach, unpaid endorsement fee or unauthorised use of your image put your financial interests at risk.

Whether you are a professional cricketer, IPL franchise, sports agent, cricket academy, talent management company or commercial brand, a sports-related legal dispute can involve substantial money, valuable commercial rights and long-term reputational consequences.

Adv. Tarun Choudhury, Supreme Court Advocate, with over 25 years of legal experience, offers legal consultation concerning complex contractual disputes, arbitration, recovery of unpaid dues, endorsement agreements, personality rights and urgent injunctions under Indian law.

Get legal clarity on your contractual position, understand the remedies available to you and assess the appropriate next steps before the dispute escalates.

Seek Legal Advice Regarding:

• IPL franchise and professional cricketer contract disputes.
• Recovery of unpaid player fees, bonuses and endorsement payments.
• Breach or termination of sports management agreements.
• Cricketer image rights and unauthorised commercial use of a name, photograph or likeness.
• Arbitration, contractual enforcement and interim injunctions.
• Sponsorship disputes, exclusivity clauses and brand endorsement conflicts.

Book a Confidential Cricket Contract Review

When valuable commercial rights are involved, delay can complicate evidence preservation, negotiations and the pursuit of urgent relief. An early legal assessment can help you identify contractual risks and make informed decisions about your next move.

Speak directly with Adv. Tarun Choudhury to discuss your legal concerns and explore the remedies available under Indian law.

Adv. Tarun Choudhury
Supreme Court Advocate | 25+ Years of Legal Experience

📞 Call: 9650499965
💬 WhatsApp: 8851978611
✉️ Email: [email protected]

Cricket contract or endorsement dispute? Book a confidential contract review today.

Confidentiality and professional engagement are subject to applicable legal and professional rules. The availability and outcome of any legal remedy depend on the facts, evidence and applicable law.

FAQs: IPL Franchise Player Contract Dispute

1. What Should a Cricketer Do in an IPL Franchise Player Contract Dispute?

A cricketer facing an IPL franchise player contract dispute should review the signed agreement, payment terms, termination clauses and dispute-resolution provisions. If the dispute concerns unpaid player fees or breach of contract, the player may consider sending a legal notice, initiating arbitration or seeking appropriate legal relief, depending on the agreement and applicable law.

2. Can a Cricketer Recover Unpaid IPL Player Fees Through Arbitration in India?

Yes. A cricketer may seek recovery of unpaid contractual fees through arbitration if a valid arbitration agreement covers the dispute. Sections 7, 21 and other applicable provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, may be relevant. The claim should be supported by the contract, payment records, correspondence and evidence establishing the amount due.

3. Can a Cricketer Obtain an Injunction Against Unauthorised Use of Their Image or Endorsement?

A cricketer may seek an injunction against unauthorised commercial use of their name, photograph, voice or likeness where the facts establish a legally recognised basis for relief. Depending on the circumstances, personality rights, copyright, passing off or contractual rights may be relevant. Courts assess the applicable legal principles and evidence before granting an injunction.

4. What Legal Action Can a Cricketer Take if a Sponsor Uses Their Image After an Endorsement Agreement Expires?

If a sponsor continues using a cricketer’s image after an endorsement agreement expires, the cricketer should examine the licence terms, expiry provisions and any continuing rights granted to the sponsor. Depending on the circumstances, the cricketer may issue a legal notice, seek an injunction, claim contractual damages or initiate arbitration if the dispute falls within a valid arbitration agreement.

5. How Can a Sports Arbitration Lawyer in India Help Resolve Cricket Contract Disputes?

A sports arbitration lawyer in India can review player contracts, franchise agreements, sponsorship arrangements and sports management contracts. Legal assistance may include drafting legal notices, assessing unpaid-fee claims, interpreting termination and exclusivity clauses, initiating arbitration, seeking urgent injunctions and protecting cricketer image rights. The appropriate strategy depends on the contract, available evidence and applicable law.

Key Takeaways: IPL Franchise Player Contract Dispute, Arbitration and Image Rights

• IPL franchise player contract disputes may involve unpaid player fees, contractual breaches, termination, sponsorship disagreements, agent commissions and unauthorised use of a cricketer’s image.
• Arbitration is an important remedy for cricket contract disputes. Where a valid arbitration agreement covers the dispute, the parties may pursue arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
• Unpaid IPL player fees can be legally recovered. The player should examine the contract, payment schedule, correspondence and supporting financial records before pursuing a contractual claim.
• Urgent injunctions may protect contractual and commercial rights. Sections 9 and 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, provide mechanisms for interim relief in appropriate cases, subject to statutory requirements.
• Cricketer personality rights deserve separate legal consideration. Unauthorised commercial use of a player’s name, image, voice or likeness may give rise to legal claims depending on the facts and applicable law.
• Copyright and personality rights are different. Ownership of a photograph does not automatically establish the right to use a cricketer’s identity for commercial endorsements.
• Expired endorsement agreements can create legal liability. Sponsors should review licence duration, permitted uses and post-expiry obligations before continuing to use a cricketer’s image.
• AI-generated fake endorsements may justify legal action. Depending on the circumstances, misleading synthetic videos or voices may raise personality-rights, passing-off or other legal issues.
• Sports agent commission disputes depend on contractual terms. Termination provisions, commission calculations and post-termination entitlements must be examined before determining liability.
• Exclusivity clauses require careful interpretation. Product categories, duration, territory, competing brands and consent provisions can determine whether an endorsement constitutes a contractual breach.
• Evidence preservation is essential. Contracts, payment records, emails, legal notices, advertisements, screenshots and electronic records can help establish the relevant facts.
• Early legal advice can prevent commercial losses. A lawyer experienced in arbitration, commercial contracts, injunctions and intellectual property can help identify suitable remedies and the appropriate legal forum.

• Online Trademark Registration in India: A Complete Guide for Brand Protection
• Influencer Marketing and Law
• Shanti Bill , 2025 : A Layman’s Guide To What’s Happening
• Regulation of Influencer Marketing & Paid Promotions in Indian Law
• A Study On Trademark Law And Social Media Influencers Disclosure And Endorsement Guideline