Introduction The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Bharat Bhogilal Patel v. TVS Electronics Ltd.…

The Delhi High Court in Baldev Singh v. Godran Rubber Plastic Industries, 1999 SCC OnLine Del 329, held that although amendments of pleadings should generally be liberally allowed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, courts cannot permit amendments that introduce a completely inconsistent case or seek to withdraw clear admissions previously made in pleadings and related proceedings. The Court observed that judicial admissions carry substantial value and can only be withdrawn upon satisfactory explanation of inadvertent mistake. Since the plaintiff sought to alter the foundation of the suit by introducing a contradictory plea of prior user after previously denying such use, the amendment application was dismissed with costs.

Introduction The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Paramvir Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. IIFL Finance…

When police officers arrive at a crime scene, one of the first and most critical questions they face is: “How…

Inheritance is one of the most emotionally sensitive and legally complex aspects of family life. Disputes over wealth often create…

A valid Waqf requires four essential elements: Permanent Dedication: The property must be given forever. Competent Dedicator (Waqif): The owner…

Moral Rights Under Copyright Act, 1957 Introduction Moral rights are not directly mentioned in the Copyright Act, 1957. But the…

Supreme Court Reasserts Constitutional Liberty: Why the Umar Khalid Bail Proceedings May Become a Turning Point in UAPA Jurisprudence The…

Introduction 1.1 Background and Context Copyright law has historically evolved as a mechanism to protect creative expression while simultaneously promoting…

In a rapidly urbanizing city like Kolkata, receiving a demolition notice can cause immense legal and personal distress, particularly for…