Introduction Copyright is not merely a legal mechanism for economic reward; it is a recognition of the intellectual, creative, and…

Foundational Pillars of India’s Free and Fair Elections Free and fair elections are the cornerstone of a democratic polity. In…

Abstract The paper deals with how the Indian Apex Court interprets the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 while incorporating…

As cities grow, policing can’t just be about rules and paperwork—it needs smart, forward-thinking strategies. With so many different people,…

Introduction Domestic violence is a serious violation of human rights that affects millions of women and families in India. Recognizing…

Abstract Judicial delays in India are a persistent challenge, undermining the right to timely justice and public confidence in the…

The Concept of Recognition in International Law The concept of Recognition serves as the gateway to the international community. In…

The commencement of arbitral proceedings is a foundational step in the arbitration process, governed by Section 21 of the Arbitration…

This article attempts to critically analyse the working paper published by Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. It proposes a hybrid model in the working paper, which applies the mandatory blanket licensing. The article critically analyzes this model and their after effects.

The Supreme Court held that the circumstantial evidence must establish only one hypothesis of guilt. The case based on circumstantial evidence has failed to satisfy the test laid down in the case of Sharad Birdhichand Sharda v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116. Reiterated, a complete and unbroken chain of evidence must be there, including the absence of any hypothesis of innocence.