Establishing Locus Standi in Digital Piracy Investigations Establishing the locus standi of the complainant is…

Investigating Digital Piracy: A Systematic Approach Digital piracy poses a growing challenge for content creators,…

Introduction The development of policing has been shaped by historical, social, and technological transformations, each…

Introduction to Digital Privacy In our digital age, where information flows freely, digital privacy is…

Abstract The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the legal system, from judicial assistance to…

A write blocker is like a digital gatekeeper for your computer information. Imagine you have a very…

The Karnataka High Court dismissed the appeal by X Corp. (formerly Twitter), decisively upholding the…

In the renowned case of K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme…

Mine-Protected Vehicles (MPVs) Mine-Protected Vehicles (MPVs), originally engineered as heavily armoured military transports for war…

Article on “Regulation of viral content in social networking sites”

Deepfakes and Indian Law — Readability Improved Introduction Technology today allows us to create almost…

Hash Values: The Cornerstone of Digital Forensics In today’s digital age, information is everywhere —…

Abstract The digital age has transformed the way humans interact, communicate, and conduct business. It…

This research paper critically examines the regulatory gap in India concerning AI, accountability, and corporate decision-making. By analyzing the adequacy of current legal frameworks—including the Companies Act of 2013, the Information Technology Act of 2000, and SEBI guidelines—alongside comparative insights from the European Union’s AI Act and U.S. corporate law, the paper seeks to illuminate the deficiencies in India’s present approach and propose pathways for reform. Employing a doctrinal methodology, the analysis draws from statutory instruments, judicial decisions, and academic literature, with particular attention to the intersection of legal liability, algorithmic bias, data protection, and corporate governance. The central thesis is that India’s legal infrastructure has yet to effectively address the accountability vacuum created by AI-driven decision-making in the corporate sphere. Consequently, legislative innovation, institutional reforms, and robust ethical oversight are urgently needed to bridge the regulatory gap while ensuring both innovation and accountability.

A Faraday bag is a specialized container used by criminal investigators to protect electronic evidence.…

Collegial Affirmation in Law Enforcement In the demanding realm of law enforcement, collegial affirmation holds…

CCTV Footage and Electronic Evidence in Indian Courts The increasing reliance on electronic evidence, particularly…

Introduction On 25th February 2021, the Government of India issued a notification introducing new social…

The use of CCTV footage as evidence has become increasingly important in Indian courts. The…

Abstract Amidst the Fourth Industrial Revolution, India’s emergence as a significant hub for artificial intelligence…