Facts FACTS:The litigation arose from a long-running business legacy of the Agarwal family that dealt in dry fruits, spices, dry…

Introduction Proving Indian citizenship is far more than showing an identity card; it is the legal affirmation of belonging, a…

Facts Perpetual Vision LLP and another party filed a commercial suit before the District Judge (Commercial Court)-01, Saket. Along with…

Facts The plaintiff, M/s KRBL Limited, is one of India’s leading companies engaged in the business of processing, marketing, and…

Introduction This research paper analyses in detail the Bombay High Court’s order concerning a long-standing trademark and contractual dispute between…

Factual Background: B.C. Hasaram & Sons Vs Smt. Nirmala Agarwal – Case Note Factual Background: The case revolved around a…

Pluralism and Personal Laws According to Werner Menski (2003), the nature of India’s personal law system is reflective of historical…

The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Parashotam Dass unequivocally reaffirmed that judicial review under Article 226 forms part of the Constitution’s basic structure and cannot be excluded by the Armed Forces Tribunal Act. By clarifying that Article 227(4) restricts only administrative superintendence, the Court restored doctrinal clarity, preserved constitutional remedies, and recalibrated the balance between tribunal autonomy and judicial oversight.

1. Introduction The principle of Audi Alteram Partem, a Latin maxim meaning “hear the other side,” constitutes one of the…

Abstract Biodiversity is not just a scientific concept; it is the immense variety of life on Earth, from genes and…