Introduction This judgment of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in P. Krishna Bhatta & Ors.…

The plea of res judicata is not a mere technical objection but a substantive right…

(As amended up to date, including the West Bengal Fire Services (Amendment) Act, 2022 and…

The Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS) The Targeted Public Distribution System (TPDS), launched in June…

Introduction In the realm of civil litigation, the question of jurisdiction stands as a cornerstone,…

Brief Introductory Head Note The case MTS Papers India Limited v. Spento Papers India LLP,…

Introduction Profiteering refers to the act of making excessive or unfair profits, especially during times…

Overview of the MMDR Act, 1957 and Amendments The MMDR Act of 1957 is the…

Introduction The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act) serves as the…

The inherent powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, reprsenet the judiciary’s residual authority to do complete justice where the procedural framework is silent or inadequate. Rooted in Section 151 and complemented by some provisions from Sections 148 to 153-A, these powers enable courts to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of process. While braod in scope, such powers remain circumscribed by the principle that they cannot contravene express statutory provisions or substitute prescribed remedies. Through judicial interpretation, including cases such as Vineeta Jamwal v. Col(Retd.) Vijay Singh and Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India, the courts have reaffirmed that inherent powers serve as the safety valve of the Code, preserving the balance between procedural discipline and substantive justice.

Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co., (1953) 2 S.C.R. 377 Introduction and Facts of…

Introduction The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (ECA), is a critical piece of Indian legislation enacted…

The Jute and Jute Textiles Control Order, 2016 The Jute and Jute Textiles Control Order,…

This is a hypothetical case scenario concerning the liability of Graham Motors Pvt. Ltd. for…

Factual Background The dispute between the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Bailey, and the respondent, Ms. Gilma…

Issue The main issue in the case is whether or not it is appropriate to…

This paper analyzes the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel through a comparative study of its evolution in England and India. It explores how the principle, rooted in equity and fairness, can extend beyond contractual reliance to ensure governmental accountability. Focusing on the socio-legal protection of sex workers, the research examines judicial precedents and welfare schemes, arguing that Promissory Estoppel should serve as a tool to uphold social justice and protect vulnerable communities from policy inconsistencies.

Case Facts The hospital was found to have inadequate manpower, poor coordination, and improper record-keeping…

Introduction Thomas Piketty’s highly influential publication, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, breathed new life into…

By Adv. Tarun Choudhury — Property & Real Estate Law Specialist, Greater Noida / NCR…