Abstract – PIL and Strategic Litigation PIL (Public interest litigation) and Strategic litigation are 21st century law mechanism , That…

Introduction The doctrine of separation of powers is a fundamental pillar of democratic governance. It ensures that the three principal…

Introduction The practice of policymaking involves answering big questions. One such question is how the process of selection and appointment…

The detention of Ladakh-based climate activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act, 1980 (NSA) has ignited intense legal and…

Introduction The judgment pronounced by the apex court one year ago in Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors v. State…

Abstract As immersive technologies become more integrated into the legal system, this paper addresses a significant legal gap by critically…

Introduction Indian democracy is in a crisis of trust, and the problem of politicians with law-breaking backgrounds has definitely come…

H

Introduction The Constitution of the United States establishes three distinct branches of government — the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial —…

‎Bail is not merely a procedural concession but a cornerstone of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Rooted in the presumption of innocence, the principle “bail not jail” has guided Indian courts for decades. Yet, recent judicial trends, stringent statutes, and misuse of preventive detention laws reflect a worrying departure from this ideal. This article critically examines the legal framework of bail in India, explores landmark judicial pronouncements, evaluates challenges posed by special legislations like UAPA and PMLA, and suggests reforms to revive the fading promise of liberty in Indian democracy.