1. Introduction
Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) for a cognisable offence is generally mandatory. However, there are limited and legally defined exceptions where a police officer may refuse to register an FIR.
2. Preliminary Enquiry for Specific Offences
Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023, allows a police officer to conduct a preliminary enquiry before registering an FIR, but only in a very specific scenario:
- The offence is punishable with 3 years or more but less than 7 years imprisonment.
- The officer must obtain prior written approval from a superior officer, not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy. SP).
- The enquiry must be completed within 14 days.
- If a prima facie case is found after the enquiry, an FIR must be registered.
It’s crucial to understand that this is a discretionary power, not a mandatory one. It cannot be used to delay or avoid FIR registration for serious offences like rape, murder, or dacoity.
3. Complaint Does Not Disclose a Cognisable Offence
A police officer can refuse to register an FIR if the complaint clearly fails to disclose a cognisable offence. This means the facts presented don’t fit the legal definition of an offence for which the police can arrest without a warrant.
- The refusal must be reasoned and documented.
- The complainant has the right to escalate the matter to the Superintendent of Police (Deputy Commissioner of Police in Police Commissionerate areas) under Section 173(4) or to a Judicial Magistrate under Section 175(3).
4. Frivolous, Vague, or Malicious Complaints
While the BNSS doesn’t explicitly use the term “frivolous”, courts have consistently held that complaints that are manifestly false, vague, or maliciously motivated can justify a refusal. However, this determination cannot be arbitrary. It must be based on a preliminary enquiry (if applicable) or a clear, objective analysis of the complaint’s content.
The Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2014) ruling clarified that while lodging an FIR is compulsory for cognisable offences, a preliminary enquiry is both permissible and crucial in specific matters (e.g., matrimonial, commercial, and corruption). This enquiry aims to distinguish genuine complaints from frivolous ones, verifying if a cognisable offence truly exists. Crucially, this pre-FIR assessment must be time-bound and cannot be utilised as a tactic to delay justice.
5. Non-Cognisable Offences
For non-cognisable offences, FIR registration is not mandatory. Instead, the police must:
- Record the information in a register.
- Refer the complainant to the magistrate for permission to investigate.
- Refusal to register an FIR for a non-cognisable offence is legally valid unless the police are directed to investigate by the magistrate.
Section 174 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, outlines the procedure for police when they receive information regarding a non-cognisable offence. It explicitly mandates that the police cannot initiate an investigation without an order from a magistrate.
6. Grounds That Are Not Legally Valid for Refusal
The BNSS explicitly prohibits the refusal of an FIR on the following grounds, as established by judicial precedent and the new law:
| Invalid Reason | Legal Position |
|---|---|
| Lack of territorial jurisdiction | A Zero FIR must be registered. The case can be transferred later to the appropriate police station. |
| Complaint sent via electronic means (e.g., email) | An e-FIR is valid. The complainant must sign a copy within 3 days. |
| The complainant resides abroad or is not physically present. | This is not a valid reason for refusal. |
| The complaint is unsigned (if sent electronically). | The FIR can be registered, but the complainant must sign it within 3 days. Refusal before that is premature. |
7. Documentation of Refusal of FIR
When a police officer refuses to register a First Information Report (FIR), they must make an entry in the General Diary (GD) or Station House Diary (SHD). This entry serves as the official record of the complaint received and the action taken.
This record must include:
- The complainant’s details and the nature of their complaint.
- The specific legal ground for the refusal.
Common Legal Grounds for Refusal
Common legal grounds for refusal include:
- The complaint pertains to a non-cognisable offence, which does not legally require an FIR.
- The complaint is manifestly false, fabricated, or frivolous as determined by a preliminary enquiry in certain cases (as per Supreme Court guidelines in Lalita Kumari).
A police officer ensures that a refusal to register an FIR is reasoned and documented by preparing a written record clearly stating the legal and factual basis for the decision, noting the complaint details, the analysis conducted, and any supporting observations, which is then signed and dated in the station’s official records.
8. Acknowledging the Complainant’s Rights
Beyond internal documentation, the officer must also provide a written acknowledgement to the complainant. This acknowledgement is crucial because it formally informs the complainant of the refusal and, more importantly, outlines their legal rights. This is a critical step under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to ensure transparency and accountability.
Written Acknowledgement Requirements
The written acknowledgement should clearly state:
- The grounds for the refusal.
- The complainant’s right to appeal to a superior officer (like the Superintendent of Police) or file a private complaint before a judicial magistrate.
9. Consequences of Illegal Refusal
Under Section 199(c) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, a public servant who wilfully disobeys the law and refuses to register an FIR for a cognisable offence may face rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to a fine.
10. Critical Assessment of Section 173(3) BNSS
The discretionary space created by Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is carefully circumscribed by judicial precedent.
Lalita Kumari and Mandatory FIR Registration
The cornerstone of this legal framework remains the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh [(2014) 2 SCC 1], which held that the registration of an FIR is mandatory when the information provided discloses a cognisable offence. A preliminary enquiry is permissible only in a very limited set of circumstances, primarily to ascertain whether the information actually discloses such an offence.
This fundamental principle continues to guide legal interpretation under the BNSS. Legal experts and anticipated judicial pronouncements suggest that the fourteen-day enquiry under Section 173(3) BNSS cannot dilute the obligation of immediate FIR registration once a cognisable offence is clearly made out.
Preliminary Enquiry And FIR Registration
Similarly, it is expected that where a preliminary enquiry reveals a prima facie case, an FIR must be promptly registered. If a case is not registered, the complainant must be duly informed, ensuring that statutory remedies remain open.
These principles collectively underscore that Section 173(3) BNSS is a narrow exception and cannot be misused by the police to delay justice or evade their statutory duty to register an FIR. Its purpose is to act as a safeguard against frivolous or malicious complaints in specific, mid-range offences, not to grant broad discretion to refuse registration.
11. Conclusion
Under the BNSS, 2023, FIR registration for cognisable offences is generally mandatory, with limited exceptions. Section 173(3) allows a time-bound preliminary enquiry for offences punishable with 3-7 years’ imprisonment, requiring prior approval from a superior officer, but cannot be misused to delay serious cases like murder or rape.
FIRs may also be refused if the complaint does not disclose a cognisable offence or is manifestly frivolous, vague, or malicious, provided the refusal is reasoned and documented. Non-cognisable offences follow Section 174, requiring magistrate approval before investigation.
Grounds For Refusal And Legal Remedies
| Issue | Legal Position |
|---|---|
| Refusal of FIR registration | Refusal on invalid grounds such as lack of jurisdiction, electronic filing, or complainant absence is prohibited. |
| Illegal refusal by public servant | Illegal refusal exposes officers to penalties under Section 199(c) BNS, 2023. |
| Preliminary enquiry | Judicial precedents, especially Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh [(2014) 2 SCC 1], reinforce that preliminary enquiries are narrow exceptions. |
| Cognisable offence established | Preliminary enquiries must not undermine the mandatory registration of FIRs once a cognisable offence is established. |
Refusal on invalid grounds such as lack of jurisdiction, electronic filing, or complainant absence is prohibited. Illegal refusal exposes officers to penalties under Section 199(c) BNS, 2023. Judicial precedents, especially Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh [(2014) 2 SCC 1], reinforce that preliminary enquiries are narrow exceptions and must not undermine the mandatory registration of FIRs once a cognisable offence is established.
Important Links
- Lawyers in India
- Copyright Registration in India
- Caveat Filing in Supreme Court of India
- Mutual Consent Divorce in Delhi/NCR : WhatsApp 9650499965
