- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Copyright Law
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Patent
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- US Interference in Brazil Election: Sovereignty, Electoral Integrity & Foreign Meddling
- Introduction to Forensic Science: Importance, Scope, and Horizons in Criminal Investigation
- Locard’s Exchange Principle: The Fundamental Cornerstone of Forensic Science
- Viscera in Forensic Medicine: A Vital Tool in Police Investigation
- Rahul Gandhi Moves Supreme Court Against Allahabad HC CBI-ED Orders
- Section 156 CrPC to Section 175 BNSS: Critical Legal Analysis
- Section 173(4) BNSS: Critical Analysis of FIR Registration and Magistrate Remedy
- Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights in India: Authorship, Ownership, Inventorship and the Emerging Legal Challenges
Author: ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN
🎖️ Recognition · Distinguished Jurist 📚 455 Published Articles
Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United & United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar & Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.
Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope Of Regional Director’s Power Under Section 16 Of Companies Act In Trademark Name Disputes In…
Introduction The judgement delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Firoz A Nadiadwala vs Seven Arts International…
Indiamart Inter Mesh Limited Vs OpenAI Inc. and Ors.: Calcutta High Court’s Landmark AI Governance Judgment The decision delivered by…
Introduction In this judgment concerning patent opposition proceedings in the agrochemical sector, the Delhi High Court has underscored the importance…
Introduction The decision of the High Court of Karnataka in Mr Santosh Kumar R.S. vs Mr Aditya Dhar is an…
Introduction The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Bharat Bhogilal Patel v. TVS Electronics Ltd.…
The Delhi High Court in Baldev Singh v. Godran Rubber Plastic Industries, 1999 SCC OnLine Del 329, held that although amendments of pleadings should generally be liberally allowed under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, courts cannot permit amendments that introduce a completely inconsistent case or seek to withdraw clear admissions previously made in pleadings and related proceedings. The Court observed that judicial admissions carry substantial value and can only be withdrawn upon satisfactory explanation of inadvertent mistake. Since the plaintiff sought to alter the foundation of the suit by introducing a contradictory plea of prior user after previously denying such use, the amendment application was dismissed with costs.
Introduction The judgment delivered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Paramvir Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. IIFL Finance…
Introduction This judgement delivered by the Patna High Court in Prashant Kishor vs The State of Bihar Through The Principal…
Introduction The decision delivered by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Geobrugg AG v. Techfab (India) Industries Limited is an…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

