- Home
- Topics
- Services
- Constitutional law
- Submit Articles
- Lawyers
- Laws
- My Account
- Members
Tags
Categories
- Administrative Law
- Animal Laws
- Arbitration
- Army laws
- Australian Law
- Aviation Law
- Bangladesh Laws
- Banking & Finance laws
- Canada Law
- Civil Law
- Company Law
- Competition Law
- Constitutional law
- Consumer laws
- Contract Laws
- Criminal Law
- Cyber Law
- Disability Laws
- Education Law
- Elderly Law
- Election Law
- Election Laws
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Family Law
- Fashion Law
- Food and Drugs
- Foreign laws
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Insurance laws
- Intellectual Property
- International law
- Judge
- Judiciary
- Jurisprudence
- Juvenile Law
- Labour Law
- Land Laws
- Laws
- Legal Profession
- Lok Adalat
- Maritime Law
- Media laws
- Medico Legal
- Minority Laws
- Miscellaneous Laws
- Motor Laws
- Personal Laws
- Politics
- Property laws
- Services
- Sports Law
- Supreme Court
- Tax laws
- Technology laws
- Third Gender
- Torts Law
- Trademark Laws
- Traffic Laws
- UAE Laws
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- US Laws
- Woman Law
- Mumbai Muharram Poisoning Case: Complete Legal Analysis, Investigation, BNS & UAPA Implications
- Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Features, Consumer Rights, CCPA, E-Commerce & Landmark Cases in India
- Democracy Under Scrutiny: Evaluating The Efficacy Of The Election Commission Of India In 2026
- Insufficiency of Disclosure in Patent Specification and Rejection of Patent Appeal
- Elective and Emergency Cesarean Sections: Risks, Complications, Catastrophes, and Management
- Cross-Border Marriages and Matrimonial Disputes: An Indian Perspective on Private International Law
- Gayatri Balasamy Judgement: Can Indian Courts Modify Arbitral Awards Under Section 34?
- How to Defend a False Dowry Case in India (2026): Complete Legal Guide Under BNS, Bail & Supreme Court Judgments
Author: ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN
🎖️ Recognition · Distinguished Jurist 📚 360 Published Articles
Professional and Literary Profile Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate, is an alumnus of the Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, with over 20 years of experience in IP litigation before the Delhi High Court. He currently serves as a Patent and Trademark Attorney at United & United, a leading intellectual property law firm. Deeply committed to legal scholarship, he has authored more than 900 articles on intellectual property law, published on major platforms including Legal Service India, Bar & Bench, Live Law, SCC Online Blog, Legal Desire, SpicyIP, among others. Beyond his legal practice, he is also an accomplished writer and poet, with over 1,500 literary works and more than 20 books published in Hindi and English. His journey reflects a unique blend of legal advocacy and creative expression, inspired by a passion for justice, knowledge, and reform.
Introduction The beauty and skincare market is crowded, and brand names often borrow from nature. When a new face cleanser…
Introduction: Delhi High Court Allows Registration of “One For All” Delhi High Court has allowed the registration of the mark…
Introduction In a clear and practical ruling, the Delhi High Court has once again reinforced that trademarks which are registered…
Introduction The case of Gillette Safety Razor Company versus Anglo-American Trading Company stands as a classic illustration of how courts…
Introduction The Delhi High Court has sent a clear message to litigants in intellectual property matters: you cannot withdraw a…
Introduction The case revolves around the trademark registration battle for the mark ‘TAJPURIYA’ in Class 33 for alcoholic beverages, highlighting…
Case Overview The Delhi High Court in a significant ruling has set aside the refusal of a patent application involving…
Madras High Court dismisses appeals by 7-Eleven International LLC, upholds Deputy Registrar’s 2014 order granting “Big Bite” trademark registration in Class 30 to Ravi Foods Private Limited as prior user in India; holds that international reputation and prior foreign adoption/early filing date cannot override local prior use absent proof of goodwill or spillover reputation in India, reinforcing strict application of territoriality under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Delhi High Court holds that in defamation suits filed against anonymous “John Doe” defendants under Section 19 CPC, territorial jurisdiction is determined based on circumstances at the time of institution, and subsequent revelation of defendants’ identities does not warrant return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10, even if it reveals a merger of wrong and residence; demurrer principle applies, barring evidentiary inquiries into plaint documents at threshold stage.
Introduction The Delhi High Court in a significant trademark rectification decision delivered on February 9, 2026, protected the long-standing seniority…
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest Legal Updates from Legal Service India
India’s Oldest Independent Digital Legal Knowledge Platform
ISBN: 978-81-928510-0-6

